The squealing of a former Bush science administrator


Readers!
 
For many reasons, mostly political but partly ethical, I do not use Google, Facebook, Twitter. They practice corrupt business policies, while targeting conservative websites for censoring, facts repeatedly confirmed by news stories and by my sense that Facebook has taken action to prevent my readers from recommending Behind the Black to their friends.
 
Thus, I must have your direct support to keep this webpage alive. Not only does the money pay the bills, it gives me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.

 

Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.


 

Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

The cries and squeals are now coming from all sides: A former undersecretary for Science in the Energy Department during the Bush administration, Raymond L. Orbach, has joined the chorus of scientists whining about the House’s proposed cuts. [His full editorial, available here as a pdf, can only be downloaded if you subscribe to Science.]

Like all the other squealers, he admits that “the budget deficit is serious.” Nonetheless, the idea of cutting his pet science programs remains unacceptable.

It is when I read stuff like this that feel the situation is most hopeless. Is there no one willing to accept the reality that if we don’t start gaining some control over the federal budget the country will go bankrupt and we will not be able to afford anything?

Instead, all I hear are cries of “Cut! Cut! But don’t cut my program!”

Share

2 comments

  • AstroWill

    Doesn’t it make a lot of sense to address the biggest parts of the Fed like privatizing social security to get if off the government books? Instead of all this focus on discretionary spending?

    http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/newsgraphics/2011/0119-budget/index.html?hp

  • Lou Filliger

    Bob – I’ve long listened to you on the John Batchelor show, and I wanted to give you the strongest congratulations for your stance on the NASA funding. To argue against “pork” funding we can’t afford, for a project you’ve devoted so much time and effort to, is the kind of integrity we sorely need in this country. Quite frankly, it’s more integrity than I myself have, though I aspire to it. You are an inspiration to me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *