Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.
Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:
If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
Cortaro, AZ 85652
Images taken 1363 days apart.
In two different papers published in two different journals in the past month, scientists have concluded that — despite the thinness of the planet’s atmosphere — the dunes and sands of Mars are being continually shaped and changed by its winds. In both papers the data from which this conclusion was drawn came from high resolution images taken by the HiRISE camera on Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter.
What is especially interesting about this conclusion is that the climate models that had been developed for the Martian atmosphere, combined with wind measurements gathered by the various Martian landers, had all suggested that the kind of strong winds necessary to move sand were rare. To quote the abstract of the paper published on Monday in the journal Geology, Bridges, et al,
Prior to Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter data, images of Mars showed no direct evidence for dune and ripple motion. This was consistent with climate models and lander measurements indicating that winds of sufficient intensity to mobilize sand were rare in the low-density atmosphere.
results from wind tunnel simulations and atmospheric models show that such strong wind events should be rare in the current Martian atmospheric setting.
Yet, both studies found significant evidence that such winds do occur on Mars, and are moving sand in many different places.
Silvestro et al for example found that the dunes in one particular dune field in Meridiani Planum were advancing approximately 1.3 to 3.3 feet per Martian year. Bridges et al in turn found that “sand is mobile throughout the north polar sand seas and exhibits variability at other latitudes.” In one case two dunes moved 30 and 60 feet respectively during the two Martian years. They concluded that “winds in the present low-density atmosphere of Mars are sufficient to move dunes and ripples in many areas of the planet.”
At the same time, Bridges et al also found that many larger dune and ripple structures showed no changes at all, suggesting that they have been in place for a long time. In order for these ripple and dune patterns to have been formed by winds, the Martian atmosphere would have had to be denser (thereby producing stronger more frequent winds), something that scientists believe might have occurred anywhere from 50,000 to 200,000 years ago, caused by the natural changes in the obliquity, inclination, and precession of the Martian orbit and rotation.
What can we draw from these results? First, it shows once again the dangers of assuming your data or models are complete. The closer we look, the more we learn, every time.
Second, the data illustrates that Mars is still a dynamic planet, albeit a relatively quiet one when compared to the Earth.
Third, the data is further proof that the Martian climate has changed drastically over the eons. Now its winds can move sand, but only in limited ways. Once, however, that atmosphere was denser and those winds were stronger, creating landforms that today appear cemented in place and unchanging.