Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.


“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.


Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.

A 1960 Soviet-era vision of the U.S.S.R. in 2017

Link here. As noted at the link:

In 1960, V. Strukova and V. Shevchenko wrote a story, illustrated by L. Smekhov, about the Soviet Union in 2017. The date was not fortuitously chosen– it marked the 100th anniversary of the October Revolution that brought the Communists to power. The authors believed that people in 2017 would be fortunate to live in a world liberated by Soviet science, where the climate could be controlled, the flow of the northern rivers could be controlled, and Alpha Centauri was a flight destination. The Moscow-based newspaper The Moscow Times described as follows Strukova and Shevchenkos’s story: “A hundred years ago, the men and women who brought Communism to the Tsarist Empire had big plans. Decades into that experiment, the U.S.S.R. was leading the world’s ‘Space Race’ and it seemed there was nothing the country couldn’t do. In 1960, the Soviet movie studio ‘Diafilm’ released a filmstrip titled ‘In the Year 2017,’ by V. Strukova and V. Shevchenko, depicting a vision of the U.S.S.R. set 57 years in the future.

While the story, with illustrations, is essentially a pro-Soviet science fiction tale written for school children, it still expresses the boundless hope for the future that filled the cultures of both the Soviet Union and the United States at that time. All dreams were possible, and given time all would come true.

This historical piece however does illustrate again the tragic but consistent failure of communism and socialist thought, wherever it has been tried. The Soviet culture of Russia dreamed big, and did accomplish much, but they were crippled by a political and economic system that guaranteed bankruptcy, leading to the collapse of that system well before its 100th anniversary.

It is a continuing tragedy that so many people today continue to believe in that system, even after so many failures.


Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

Your support is even more essential to me because I keep this site free from advertisements and do not participate in corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.

You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:


Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


  • Joe

    Always looking for that utopia in the far future, so sure that science will be able to control the climate!

  • wodun

    Do any of our scientific class that think they should direct policy realize the roots of their ideology lie in technocratic socialism?

  • wayne

    Excellent thought.
    -Sadly, “yes they do and they approve wholeheartedly.”
    Fellow-traveler’s and useful-idiots, have no clue. They are just along for ride.

  • Edward

    So the Soviet scientists and engineers were going to build underground cities and atomic trains, dam up oceans, and control the weather. Families were going to be separated to men on land and wives and their little kindergarteners on boats.

    Meanwhile, the western scientists and engineers predicted flying cars, which will never happen, of course. (5 minutes, “4 Real Flying Cars That Actually Fly”)

  • wayne

    Interesting flying-car video.

    Commies have been doing their scientific-socialist, new-man-utopia, mumbo-jumbo, stuff, since the 1930’s. It is however, a good insight into their bizzaro-world view.

    Personally, I like our own homegrown, science-fiction-y, brand of Futurism, as represented in this wonderful piece of what Upton Sinclair would call “Boosterism.”

    To New Horizons
    Jam Handy- General Motors

    –watch the whole thing, it morphs to full-color at about the 8:00 mark.
    The optimism is amazing and the “wonder world of 1960,” is not all that bad! (designed by Norman Bel Geddes.)

    “Definitive document of pre-World War II futuristic utopian thinking, as envisioned by General Motors. Documents the “Futurama” exhibit in GM’s “Highways and Horizons” pavilion at the New York World’s Fair, which looks ahead to the “wonder world of 1960.””

  • Edward

    It seems that they correctly predicted a lot of 1960, back in 1940. They even predicted rooftop helipads and Disneyland, though they did not mention that 1960 amusement parks would be themed. They even correctly predicted that the world would be in living color from 1960 onward. ;-)

    The future used to look so good. What happened once we got here?

    Oh, that’s right. Obama, and his vision of central control and individual and national mediocrity.

    No wonder Trump was able to win with his slogan “Making America Great Again!”

  • wayne

    The Archive has good stuff– highly recommend.

    Interesting short commentary which illustrates the difference between “projecting the present, into the future,” and “predicting the future.”

    Joseph Barbera on “The Jetsons”

  • Joe

    Edward and Wayne, here is video of a flying car from the late 1950’s
    At 3.53 seconds it’s airborne, the trouble with flying cars is that they do neither very well, they don’t fly so nice and they don’t drive so nice. Flying cars will remain the domain of the very well to do.

  • wayne

    This also reminds me of the car-boat–The Amphicar.

  • Cotour

    There are modern versions of this auto / plane vehicle, IMO they are for the most part are totally useless and exercises in non functional fantasy. There are however newer versions of personal air transportation vehicles that by using new technology and materials are actual viable candidates for real functional VTOL machines.

    The Moller air car was the first serious attempt at achieving the goal IMO but will now be surpassed by these new more achievable design concepts that will actual be on the market sooner rather than later.

  • wayne

    Does anyone remember, all the phony-baloney genetics stuff the commies bought into?

  • Cotour

    He seems to reject the concept of adaptation of an organism to its environment. What must it have been like to go from a star to become disfavored by Stalin?

    “The organism and the conditions required for its life are an inseparable unity. Different living bodies require different environmental conditions for their development. By studying these requirements we come to know the qualitative features of the nature of organisms, the qualitative features of heredity. Heredity is the property of a living body to require definite conditions for its life and development and to respond in a definite way to various conditions.[7]”

  • wayne

    to clarify slightly– Stalin loved Lysenko. Nobody challenged Lysenko (and lived) until after Stalin died.

    Totally off the wall;

    For my entry in the “All-time Ever, Bizzaro-World, Commie Pseudo-Science propaganda” Stuff:
    [This is Extremely Disturbing. It’s all fake, but it’s disturbing. Pure commie lies with a veneer of “science.” They even sucked-in a noted (real) scientist, J.B.S. Haldane, to make it sound even better.]

    “Experiments in the Revival of Organisms”
    “Techfilm Studio, Moscow”
    (19:32 B&W)

  • Edward

    I forgot to mention that Obama also wanted to control the weather/climate, just as the film strip said that the Soviet’s did.

    Lysenko is an interesting topic, and I have a friend who uses his name as a verb, especially when talking about global warming.

    Norman Borlaug is a better example of scientific agricultural advancement. Not only was he not a government stooge with pseudo-science, as Lysenko was, but he actually (not politically) advanced agriculture in ways that now feed billions more people than could have been imagined, back in those days. That is the advantage of genetically modifying food. Today, many people pretend to be frightened of such foods, perhaps not realizing that they have eaten nothing but genetically modified foods their entire lives.

    Nice video. I think I saw a video of that car being transformed at the Reno Air Show, where he mentioned he was going next. The trouble that I usually talk about with flying cars is not performance or cost, as the pickup truck also leaves much to be desired as a car or as a truck, though it is popular because it is still useful as both at a low cost. I usually talk about safety.

    A car with maintenance problems only has to pull over to the side of the road, a quick, relatively safe action, but a flying car has to descend for a few precious minutes before it can land anywhere, minutes during which a problem can turn disastrous, and there are areas without a lot of good places to set down, such as mountains and forests. Thus, owners of flying cars will have to keep them maintained like an airplane, not like most of us keep our cars maintained. After all, did you take your car in for its latest routine 15,000-mile servicing? Me neither.

    Thus a flying car will still cost about as much as an airplane, but as you mentioned, it won’t have the nice performance as either an airplane or a car.

    The reality of having a flying car does not live up to the fantasy.

    I think you are right, Joe. For quite some time, it will only be the well to do who own flying cars. For many products, the well to do are the early adopters, and the rest of us get them as the price decreases. This didn’t happen with flying cars over the past half century, and I don’t foresee it happening in the next half century, either.

    However, we are still better off with our ground cars than our ancestors were with their horses and buggies, if they could afford them.

    Now, if only we can figure out how influence the weather …

Readers: the rules for commenting!


No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.


However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.


Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *