Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.
Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:
If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
Cortaro, AZ 85652
Steven Goddard has once again taken a close look at the climate data gathering at NOAA and NASA and found clear evidence of tampering.
He not only documents how the scientists at these agencies have adjusted the raw data to cool the past and warm the present to create the illusion of global warming, they have done so with a limited data base.
The bulk of the data tampering is being done by simply making temperatures up. If NOAA is missing data for a particular station in a particular month, they use a computer model to calculate what they think the temperature should have been.
Those calculations are then designed to support the theory of human caused global warming, caused by increased carbon dioxide.
Goddard doesn’t just tell us his opinions, he backs up his conclusions with detailed graphs and data.
Do I accept Goddard’s conclusions entirely? Maybe. The two questions I ask that none of the NOAA or NASA scientists have been willing to answer are these:
Since these government scientists have refused to answer these basic questions, even stonewalling elected officials who ask them, I lean strongly towards accepting Goddard’s harsh conclusion that these scientists are frauds and are purposely tampering with the data for political purposes.