A FAA waiver granted to SpaceX for its next launch outlines details on the company’s effort to recover the first stage for reuse.

My annual birthday-month fund-raising drive for Behind the Black is now on-going. Not only do your donations help pay my bills, they give me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.


Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.


Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:

If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

The competition heats up: A FAA waiver granted to SpaceX for its next launch outlines the details of the company’s effort to recover the first stage for reuse.

The first stage will coast after stage separation, and then perform an experimental burn with three engines to reduce the entry velocity just prior to entry. Prior to landing in the water, it will perform a second experimental burn with one engine to impact the water with minimal velocity. The second stage will coast and then perform an experimental burn to depletion.

Elon Musk has said that they will be experimenting with bringing the first stage back safely with each launch of the upgraded Falcon 9 rocket. This waiver now gives us the plan for the first launch. It also shows that they are also considering recovery of the second stage as well.



  • joe

    So, does an inversion layer cause an increased risk to the rocket or is this just a function of if the rocket explodes that there is more collateral damage on the ground?, very interesting, I never realized that something as simple as an inversion layer would have an impact on a launch!

  • Tom Billings

    At a guess, this is not because of the Falcon 9, which burns LOX and Kerosene, but because the Dragon still uses the old Nitrogen Tetroxide/Hydrazine combination for its attitude control thrusters. Hydrazine is a deadly poison that kills people when Protons crash in Kazahkstan too near a village. Nitrogen Tetroxide cleverly settles on the mucous membranes of your throat and lungs, and reacts with the water there to make nitric acid.

    Anything with several hundred kilos of that combo is cause for worrying about an inversion layer getting the vapors from an explosion trapped near the ground. They are hypergolic, and react so fast that 2 large volumes of them smacked together will react at the surface hard and fast enough to blow the vast bulk of it into two separate clouds, both of them deeply unfriendly to anything living.

    I could really wish the newer NOFBX monopropellants with performance equal to Hydrazine/Nitrogen Tet. were certified when the design of the Dragon started.

  • Tom,

    You might be right in general, but the waiver was specifically for the next Falcon 9 launch, which will not have Dragon on board.

  • Tom Billings

    Yup! Gotta watch that more carefully. Shrouds are *not capsules! :-)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *