Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.


“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.


Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.

A memo from Google advising employees on correct thought

Link here. This memo clarifies for everyone what is expected of Google employees. I especially find this quote informative:

Please remember, as you no doubt read in the Employee Handbook, Google’s commitment to diversity is complete and unequivocal. Any variance from diversity is not permitted and will be dealt with immediately. It is only when all of us think exactly the same thoughts that we can achieve perfect diversity.

Of course, Google is also completely committed to the advancement of science and human knowledge. If history has taught us anything, it is that science can only flourish where the allowable topics of discussion are highly circumscribed. Approved subjects of conversation are posted throughout the campus, so please look before you speak.

I believe some of the problem lately has been a simple misunderstanding of my last memo. Unfortunately, I mistyped that Google “approves of free speech.” I meant to write that Google must “approve free speech.” I want all of our employees to feel perfectly free to express themselves however their political, moral, or religious beliefs impel them; provided of course that they receive prior written authorization.

Read it all. It really explains everything.


Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

Your support is even more essential to me because I keep this site free from advertisements and do not participate in corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.

You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:


Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


  • Richard


    I’m 99.9% sure that this is a parody.

  • Richard: Heh. I am 100% sure.

  • Let me add this: That you think it necessary to tell me that this is a parody demonstrates the absurdity of Google’s actions this week. It has become hard for people to tell the difference between their actual actions, ridiculous and contradictory, and a parody that is equally ridiculous and contradictory.

  • Andrew

    Yeah. a “Mutually Exclusive Propositions”? Seriously?

    And that NAME? Unoi’m Carasee, Might that not be a deliberate ruse. U no i’m Cara See, You know I am Cara See?

    This reeks of hoax/parody.

  • Joe

    Couldn’t read the whole thing, double plus ungood!

  • Cotour

    Once individuals in the public can no longer tell what is real and true and what is a creation of someones or some entities agenda, the only thing that remains is where THEY decide to draw the line.

    Sound familiar?

    You make an un disputable observation and resulting point of logic about our current reality. It can only get worse.

  • Cotour

    PS: It can only get worse if we the individuals limit ourselves and there by remain blind to where that line might be drawn. Find the line of believability and be able to objectively rationalize and justify moving it and you can do pretty much anything that can be rationalized and justified.

    Its a fairly simple formula which this story and comment panel perfectly demonstrates.

  • Richard

    I agree with you Bob. The actions of companies such as Google are so absurd that the line between reality and parody is tough to discern.

  • Cotour

    Its not the difference between reality and parody, and this is the point that was made, its the difference between reality and a crafted narrative presented and accepted as reality and the inability to reliably tell the difference. Two very different things.

    Parody is about humor and self reflection, what we are seeing is the shaping of a desired perception of reality that delivers a desired result and in turn a belief system.

  • pzatchok

    The only way I knew it was a parody was because I know Google would never leave a paper trail.

  • ken anthony

    It’s April already?

Readers: the rules for commenting!


No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.


However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.


Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *