A team of Italian scientists have reviewed the earlier faster-than-light neutrino results and have rejected them.

For many reasons, mostly political but partly ethical, I do not use Google, Facebook, Twitter. They practice corrupt business policies, while targeting conservative websites for censoring, facts repeatedly confirmed by news stories and by my sense that Facebook has taken action to prevent my readers from recommending Behind the Black to their friends.
Thus, I must have your direct support to keep this webpage alive. Not only does the money pay the bills, it gives me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.


Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.


Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:

If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

Not so fast: A team of Italian scientists have reviewed the earlier faster-than-light neutrino results and have rejected them.


One comment

  • Chris Kirkendall

    This is what pure Science ia all about – always questioning conventional beliefs & theories, but also a healthy dose of skepticism of new theories that would contradict current theory. No one should ever be afraid of new ideas – but at the same time, a new idea or theory, no matter how “exciting” or intriguing, has to be tried & tested, challenged independently, by numeorus unconnected researchers before we can declare its validity. Contrast this with the IPCC covering up data that contradicted their pre-conceived notions of man-made global warming. That is NOT science – you cannot just discard or ignore data you don’t like. But in this case, it’s refreshing to see real Science working the way it’s supposed to…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *