Atlas 5 man-rated upgrades approved by NASA for Starliner launches

Pioneer cover

From the press release: From the moment he is handed a possibility of making the first alien contact, Saunders Maxwell decides he will do it, even if doing so takes him through hell and back.

Unfortunately, that is exactly where that journey takes him.

The vision that Zimmerman paints of vibrant human colonies on the Moon, Mars, the asteroids, and beyond, indomitably fighting the harsh lifeless environment of space to build new societies, captures perfectly the emerging space race we see today.

He also captures in Pioneer the heart of the human spirit, willing to push forward no matter the odds, no matter the cost. It is that spirit that will make the exploration of the heavens possible, forever, into the never-ending future.

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at amazon, Barnes & Noble, all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit.

Capitalism in space: ULA announced this week that its Atlas 5 rocket has passed a NASA review that now approves the design changes necessary to allow that rocket to launch Boeing’s Starliner manned capsule.

“Design Certification Review is a significant milestone that completes the design phase of the program, paving the way to operations,” said Barb Egan, ULA Commercial Crew program manager. “Hardware and software final qualification tests are underway, as well as a major integrated test series, including structural loads. Future tests will involve launch vehicle hardware, such as jettison tests, acoustic tests, and, finally, a pad abort test in White Sands, New Mexico.”

Launch vehicle production is currently on track for an uncrewed August 2018 Orbital Flight Test (OFT).

The schedule to make that August flight happen still remains tight, but this approval brings it one step closer.


Every July, to celebrate the anniversary of the start of Behind the Black in 2010, I hold a month-long fund-raising campaign to make it possible for me to continue my work here for another year.

This year's fund-raising drive however is more significant in that it is also the 10th anniversary of this website's founding. It is hard to believe, but I have been doing this for a full decade, during which I have written more than 22,000 posts, of which more than 1,000 were essays and almost 2,600 were evening pauses.

This year's fund drive is also more important because of the growing intolerance of free speech and dissent in American culture. Increasingly people who don't like what they read are blatantly acting to blackball sites like mine. I have tried to insulate myself from this tyrannical effort by not depending on Google advertising or cross-posts Facebook or Twitter. Though this prevents them from having a hold on me, it also acts to limit my exposure.

Therefore, I hope you will please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.


Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


  • ken anthony

    It’s a bit unfair to all companies involved, now and future, that there will be a loss of life one day and the other companies will use it against them. Only possibly restrained by the fact they may get their turn. I hope I’m being overly cynical?

  • Localfluff

    Finally! This should’ve been done so long ago. Atlas V, I read, has 73 out of 74 launch successes, and the partially failed one had its upper stage firing four seconds too late or early, only marginally lowering the lifetime of its payload. Big space has one advantage and that is track record for launch reliability. I doubt that Boeing, Lockmart or Arianespace can compete head on with low cost launch technology anytime soon. I think they should keep their proven launchers flying for longer than now seems anticipated. And crew them in order to motivate the extra hundred million or so per trip. Ariane V launching JWST, that’s their market. Big budget projects where another hundred million doesn’t matter anymore, they just want a rocket that has never failed.

  • Doug

    Why does Boeing not have to do an inflight abort test?

  • Kirk

    +Doug: The best explanation I’ve found is:

    > … However, Boeing will not perform a flight-abort test, said former NASA astronaut Chris Ferguson, now Boeing’s director of crew and mission operations.

    > “We looked very early on at where we could get the most testing value,” Ferguson said, and “made the conscious decision” that the company could certify the vehicle in a wind tunnel and did not need to conduct a flight-abort test. He added that “we consider the pad-abort test more robust and challenging” and said the company is currently conducting many abort-system tests in a wind tunnel.

    > Kathy Lueders, program manager for NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, confirmed that NASA’s safety thresholds did not specifically require an in-flight test of the abort system. The guidelines did require that the companies “show that they have the abort reliability that we needed to have. And so we provided them the ability to propose their own strategy for how they met that, and both currently are meeting the requirements.”

  • wodun

    Would SpaceX us an old F9 for the in flight abort test or will they use a new F9 Block V?

    The former wouldn’t represent too much of a cost and SpaceX is probably wondering how they will get rid of their old stock.

    It is nice to see that all of these companies are finishing up this program and will finally start flinging people.

  • Anthony Domanico


    It was my understanding that SpaceX won’t be doing an in-flight abort test. Has this changed or am I mistaken?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *