Pioneer cover

From the press release: From the moment he is handed a possibility of making the first alien contact, Saunders Maxwell decides he will do it, even if doing so takes him through hell and back.

Unfortunately, that is exactly where that journey takes him.

The vision that Zimmerman paints of vibrant human colonies on the Moon, Mars, the asteroids, and beyond, indomitably fighting the harsh lifeless environment of space to build new societies, captures perfectly the emerging space race we see today.

He also captures in Pioneer the heart of the human spirit, willing to push forward no matter the odds, no matter the cost. It is that spirit that will make the exploration of the heavens possible, forever, into the never-ending future.

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at amazon, Barnes & Noble, all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.

August 26, 2020 Zimmerman/Batchelor podcast

Embedded below the fold in two parts.


I must unfortunately ask you for your financial support because I do not depend on ads and rely entirely on the generosity of readers to keep Behind the Black running. You can either make a one time donation for whatever amount you wish, or you sign up for a monthly subscription ranging from $2 to $15 through Paypal or $3 to $50 through Patreon.

Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

Your support is even more essential to me because I not only keep this site free from advertisements, I do not use the corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook to promote my work. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.

You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:


Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

Or you can donate by using Zelle through your bank. You will need to give my name and email address (found at the bottom of the "About" page). The best part of this electronic option is that no fees will be deducted! What you donate will be what I receive.


  • MadRocketSci

    Re: Beta-Voltaic batteries: I’ve advocated looking into this sort of technology for years. Glad someone is doing it. The limitation is energy density (per mass, per volume), but the prospect of having the power last as long as the half-life of the driving isotope is very real. For low-power devices, this could be huge. It will require an outbreak of sanity wrt our civilization’s hysteria about radiation, radioactivity, and nuclear technology in general.

  • MadRocketSci

    Re: China: I don’t think it’s automatically “stealing” to start trying to do reasonable things like reusing a booster stage or doing water landing of boosters on a platform downrange. That’s not SpaceX’s idea, that’s Isaac Newton’s idea! (SpaceX acknowledged its debt to the DC-X program, for example. I’d hate to have had some defunct government program trying to extract rent from them for doing a reasonable thing.) We should be happy that more people are building reasonable things that the physics of rocket flight require of us.

    I suppose I’m souring on the concept of intellectual property in general, seeing how it is usually used. I’ve seen the most ridiculous things patented and used to destroy people. I’ve seen “inventions” patented before the patenter had any idea how to actually build it, then used to sue the actual inventor who later figured out how to actually build the thing. I’ve seen obvious use cases for a technology patented to prevent the actual inventors from being able to sell to certain types of customers. I’ve seen *math* patented. Supposedly patents reward inventors, scientists, and engineers, but has it worked that way for the past few decades? Patents these days are taken by the employers of the inventors, scientists, and engineers, who often had to do their work in defiance of narrow short-term management, on their own time. Independent shops almost never are able to gain any advantage from them, but large concerns use them to harass independent startups all the time. Whatever intellectual property was conceptually supposed to do, we have to realize what it’s actually doing to us.

    The Chinese might have the right idea: A technique, technology, invention, concept etc, “belongs” to whoever is capable of comprehending it and making use of it. Defection from this perverse system is certainly providing them with an advantage relative to the legally strangled west.

  • MadRocketSci

    I’ve patented something myself (as a resume item), but I almost wish I hadn’t. It’s a little lab instrument that will let us take a particular measurement faster than with a standard setup. My employer has told me they don’t want me “wasting my time” actually trying to build it though, and that we don’t have the money. But they’ll patent it and sue any other lab that tries to do something similar in the future. The wheels were already in motion when they changed their minds about building it. Annoying, because I had the parts list and quotes ready to go.

    I think we could have a Rennaisance just by nuking the patent system (and copyright also, while we’re at it.) Or doing some drastic reform like making patents and copyrights non-transferrable from the inventor/author, so that the inventors/authors can maintain their professional independence, instead of being reduced to techno-serfs.

  • James Street

    I saw this article on Yahoo Finance yesterday about a new battery from Elon Musk. I don’t know if it’s related to Robert’s nuclear diamond battery, and also Yahoo News is not a reliable news source. But it’s worth keeping an eye on the news on September 22:

    “We are watching to see if Tesla and Elon Musk will reveal a ‘million-mile’ battery: Xpeng CEO”

    “Musk is widely expected to reveal a major advancement in battery technology at its Sept. 22 celebration. The anticipation is a small part of the reason Tesla’s stock has exploded 190% inside of six months.

    ‘In our opinion this battery technology will be very advanced, potentially last for decades, withstand all types of weather/terrain, and be another major milestone for the Tesla ecosystem. In theory this battery will support an electric vehicle for 1 million miles and be a major step forward when competing vs. traditional gasoline powered automotive competitors from both an ROI and environmental perspective,’ says Wedbush Securities analyst and Tesla bull Dan Ives.”

  • Edward

    You wrote: “I think we could have a Rennaisance just by nuking the patent system (and copyright also, while we’re at it.)

    Actually, it is the other way around. It was when intellectual property became protected that innovation blossomed.

    You may disagree with how your employer used or misused your invention, but that does not mean that the patent system is a bad idea or that it hinders innovation. You had other examples that show how the U.S. patent system degraded after they dropped the requirement that a working model be made, demonstrating the importance of how a patent system is implemented.

    James Street,
    I’m pretty sure that the technology that the article discusses is for rechargeable batteries. One of the more limiting and expensive factors for electric cars is the limited life of batteries and the way batteries are managed during use. If a battery set can outlast the car, then it is like not having to replace an expensive gas tank every 100,000 miles or so.

Readers: the rules for commenting!


No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.


However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.


Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *