Scroll down to read this post.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. I keep the website clean from pop-ups and annoying demands. Instead, I depend entirely on my readers to support me. Though this means I am sacrificing some income, it also means that I remain entirely independent from outside pressure. By depending solely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, no one can threaten me with censorship. You don't like what I write, you can simply go elsewhere.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:


5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.


Blue Origin engine testing update

The competition heats up: Jeff Bezos has released an update on Blue Origin’s test program of its BE-4 rocket engine, being built as a possible replacement for the Russian engines in the Atlas 5.

Bezos’s final comment kind of explains why Boeing has favored them over Aerojet Rocketdyne for this engine:

One of the many benefits of a privately funded engine development is that we can make and implement decisions quickly. Building these two new test cells is a $10 million commitment, and we as a team made the decision to move forward in 10 minutes. Less than three weeks later we were pouring the needed three-foot thick foundations. Private funding and rapid decision making are two of the reasons why the BE-4 is the fastest path to eliminate U.S. dependence on the Russian-made RD-180.

I imagine however a lot of Congressmen are upset by this. If they do it too cheaply or too quickly there will be far less opportunity to spend pork in their districts!

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 
The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

7 comments

  • “We have to stop this ludicrous haste, and bring Blue to Standard Industry Practice for the past 50 years!” – aka get government money, and make decisions as slowly as possible.

    On a more serious note, meanwhile the US government is funding the development of Aerojet-Rocketdyne’s substitute for the RD-180 when the BE-4 will be ready two years earlier. So the pork continues to flow…

  • mike shupp

    Uhhhh…. It’s great fun for us space enthusiasts to grumble about how Congress critters ruin progress in space by ignoring the future and exploiting pork in the present. It’s so visible! Other hand, let’s suppose Congress is destroying prospects for fusion energy for the sake of pork, Congress is prohibiting the advance of lighter-than-air airships for ferrying cargo about for the sake of pork, Congress is limiting really high speed Internet traffic for the sake of pork, Congress is prohibiting advances in building construction for the sake of pork, Congress is restricting manufacturers use of robot technology for the sake of pork ….

    Should we suppose spaceflight is the unique victim of Congressional trangressions? Or should we assume that spaceflight is only one of many human activities to be victimized by government? And is it only the present day American government which inflicts such evils upon us, or all governments all the time?

  • Tom Billings

    “Or should we assume that spaceflight is only one of many human activities to be victimized by government? And is it only the present day American government which inflicts such evils upon us, or all governments all the time?”

    All and all? No. Only when the agency costs of government have time to become the dominant costs of getting something done. Hierarchies, in theory, are *not*supposed* to have agency costs, but being made up of homo sapiens sapiens, they accumulate them anyway.

    A hierarchy is supposed to have a united and singular purpose around which it controls the use of resources. In fact, as resources are expended, the human agents see things they would rather those resources, from their own time to their own budgets, that they think are good ideas. Down low in a hierarchy’s pyramid, agents have the constraints of small resources under their control and many eyes of equals around them. However, the higher you go in a hierarchy, the fewer equals there are, and the more resources are under your control.

    Thus, we find that as you go up a hierarchy agency costs escalate, until they become exponential. As time goes on, many good things come to the attention of hierarchs for resources to be expended on that are *not* the singular united purpose of the hierarchy. The fewer people to say no to those “good things”, the more upper hierarchs are tempted to send resources to them. And they do that, as time goes on.

    Hierarchies are good decision-makers on short timescales. When the hierarchs have time to find all the *other* good things to spend resources on, the agency costs start to climb. Congressional committee members are infamously long-tenured, and sit at the top of all government hierarchies.

    Agency costs exist in civil society’s networks as well, of course. The difference is that they are acknowledged as a normal part of the working environment, and named. They are called “profit”. Those profits are regulated by whether or not the costs they impose are accepted by equals in the market networks over time. This is why quickly communicating networks are good for production, in the long-term while hierarchies are good for control, in the short-term.

    This is why we want governments doing a very few things over short time frames, like wars, and why we want market networks doing things over longer time frames.

  • Edward

    Mike wrote: “It’s great fun for us space enthusiasts to grumble about how Congress critters ruin progress in space by ignoring the future and exploiting pork in the present. … Should we suppose spaceflight is the unique victim of Congressional trangressions?”

    No. But if those other industries are having problems, they need to complain about them; they understand them better. I, for one, do not have experience with Congressional interference with internet traffic, building construction, or robot technology. What has Congress done to these industries, and what needs to be done to correct the problems?

    Unless you think that a coalition of industries needs to be formed to move Congress out of the way of innovation, efficiency, and progress.

    I believe that we should speak out where we can: for ourselves, for no one else will — they don’t know our problems or the solutions, just as we don’t know theirs and can’t speak for them.

  • Wayne

    Tom Billing’s wrote in part:

    [This is why we want governments doing a very few things over short time frames, like wars, and why we want market networks doing things over longer time frames.]
    and
    [This is why quickly communicating networks are good for production, in the long-term while hierarchies are good for control, in the short-term.]
    —————————————————–
    Very good, well stated, concise post!
    You have an excellent grasp on what is often an extremely difficult idea to get across to people.

    -Highly recommend anything by Professor Richard Epstein, as it relates to our modern Governmental structures & their interaction with private-business via Regulation & the Administrative State.
    He’s done excellent (and very enlightening) work on “networked industries,” starting with Railroads, all the way to the Internet. (Classical Liberal law Professor, works with the University of Chicago & the Hoover Institution.)

  • mike shupp

    Interesting answers, which will inspire some thinking on my part.
    Thank you, gentlemen!

  • Wayne

    mike shupp:
    (anyone!)

    Highly recommend, as an introduction;

    Richard Epstein: “Is the Administrative State Consistent with the Rule of Law?”
    https://youtu.be/PPSglKMzx5o

    (among scores of video presentations he’s done, as well as his numerous books & law articles.)

    This man packs more great idea’s/history/commentary (‘truth’) into each minute of speaking, than anyone I have ever heard in my entire life.
    [aka “the smartest man alive,” on these topics, respectfully by his peers.]

    His work on “networked-industries,” in particular, that is, business’s that require mutual cooperation in & among themselves to actually work, might be of high interest to the audience of BtB.
    >Railroads, Interstate Trucking, Pipeline’s, Telephone Systems, Electrical Distribution Systems, Airlines, Natural “Monopolies”, Space, the Internet…. everything/anything along those lines.

    He covers Agency-problems/costs, Cooperation, Regulation, “the taking’s clause” (Imminent Domain), Rate-regulation, Work-regulation, the EPA, etc., etc.

    A true Classical Liberal in the best tradition of the Rule of Law, as developed throughout history & in particular, our American History.

    (He’s also a recognized expert on Roman Law & British Common Law, from whence we get the underpinning’s of our Law.)

    Catch him, as well, on the John Batchelor Show–regularly appearance’s.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *