Scroll down to read this post.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. I keep the website clean from pop-ups and annoying demands. Instead, I depend entirely on my readers to support me. Though this means I am sacrificing some income, it also means that I remain entirely independent from outside pressure. By depending solely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, no one can threaten me with censorship. You don't like what I write, you can simply go elsewhere.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:


5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.


China launches military satellite

Using its Long March 2D rocket, China today successfully launched a satellite in its classified Yaogan series, suspected to be for military reconnaissance.

In fact, so little is known about the Yaogan satellites that we aren’t even sure how many were placed in orbit today. Normally a Yaogan launch puts three satellites into orbit (which is what this Space.com article assumes). The story from China’s state-run press above however does not say this at all. Instead, it implies that only one Yaogan satellite was launched.

Regardless, the leaders in the 2022 launch race:

47 SpaceX
45 China
14 Russia
8 Rocket Lab
7 ULA

American private enterprise still leads China 67 to 45 in the national rankings. It is now tied with the entire world combined 67 to 67. This launch today also brings the launch total this year to 134, which ties the record for the most successful launches in a single year, set last year. With two and a half months still to go, 2022 should end up breaking that record significantly.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 
The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

5 comments

  • sippin_bourbon

    Curious how you are counting the Firefly Alpha launch.
    Some are calling is a partial failure, others a launch failure.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefly_Alpha
    https://twitter.com/seradata/status/1577956803165519872

    Not sure what your metric is on these things, or how you have counted them in the past.

    Granted, this was a still a test run, and it did get to orbit, though not the intended orbit.

  • Gary H

    “Curious how you are counting the Firefly Alpha launch.
    Some are calling is a partial failure, others a launch failure.”
    How can we confirm that Chinese launch to the intended orbit?
    It seems to me that launch to orbit without qualifiers is the best that can be done.

  • sibbin_bourbon: My rule for counting launches is essentially my own judgment. Generally, if the launch is from an operational rocket (already tested and flying customers), the launch has to be a success, putting the satellites where they were supposed to go. If the launch is a test of a new rocket, then simply getting the payloads into any orbit where they can operate counts.

    With Firefly, Alpha got the payloads into an orbit that allowed these short term cubesats to function. Their live spans were shortened by the lower orbit, but they still worked. One operator told me he counted this as “a success.”

    Note that this is still a judgment call on my part. As the numbers of launches rises, counting one questionable launch will matter less and less, in the general scheme of things. And since my goal in doing this list is to illustrate the overall trends, these specific details also matter less overall.

  • sippin_bourbon

    “Note that this is still a judgment call on my part.”

    Yes, indeed for all of us.
    There is no hardened criteria.

    TY

  • Edward

    Counting this as an orbital launch makes much sense, even if it had been an operational rocket. The launch vehicle achieved orbit, and is this not the measurement here?

    One of the Space Shuttle launches had a premature shutdown of one of its main engines, resulting in a lower orbit than intended. Should this have been considered a failed launch? In the late 1990s, there was a launch of two satellites on an Ariane V, but one of the satellites was heavier than it was supposed to be, resulting in both satellites having to use far too much of their own fuel to reach geostationary orbit. Should this have been considered a failure of the Ariane?

    It seems to me that if the launch vehicle reaches orbit, then it is a successful orbital launch, as it successfully reached orbit. If Robert wants to consider whether the orbit reached was useful for the payload, then that is his prerogative.

    On the other hand, in order to be consistent he would have to verify that the historic launch record also conforms to his definition of a successful orbital launch, so maybe we should allow for a little inconsistency in the annual launch report and its charts.
    https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/essays-and-commentaries/2021-the-year-that-private-enterprise-took-over-rocketry/

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *