Scroll down to read this post.


Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. I keep the website clean from pop-ups and annoying demands. Instead, I depend entirely on my readers to support me. Though this means I am sacrificing some income, it also means that I remain entirely independent from outside pressure. By depending solely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, no one can threaten me with censorship. You don't like what I write, you can simply go elsewhere.


You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:


1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.


2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:

5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

College punishes students for sexist chanting at party, even those not there

Fascists: The University of Mary Washington has punished its entire rugby team of 46 because 8 attended a party where some had participated in “sexist chanting.”

The microaggression unfolded last November at a house party near the Fredericksburg, Virginia, campus, according to Jezebel’s Erin Gloria Ryan. Some students, likely drunk, sang a demeaning song about raping corpses and “wiggling it” inside whores—inappropriate stuff, to be sure, though not really targeted at a specific entity in a threatening way. The chant apparently has its origins in rowdy “pub” songs. It’s a curious tradition, though not one intended to inspire actual malice, it seems.

But someone at the party recorded the chant; eventually, UMW’s Feminists United on Campus found out about it and made sure university administrators were informed. This led to an investigation, and eventually, the end of the rugby team. The location of the party was said to be a “rugby house”—even though only two members of the team actually lived there—and so the entire team had to pay the price.

First of all, the chanting, as ugly as it might have been, is perfectly legal under the first amendment. Not only was it merely speech, it took place off campus in a private residence, where the college has limited jurisdiction.

Second, what kind of justice is it for the college to punish all the members of the rugby team when only a few even attended the party? Even if it had to right to do so (which I question), punishing innocent third parties is beyond Stalinistic.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.

The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News


  • Cotour

    Looks to me like there was a “hit” put out on the rugby team and this was just the catalyst that gave the excuse to execute the hit.

    Rugby is a “violent” sport much like football and it may encourage too much rowdy male activity and head trauma which is unacceptable in the coming new world.

    Fascism? Sure, why not.

  • Nicholas Paizis

    “the chanting, as ugly as it might have been, is perfectly legal under the first amendment”

    The First Amendment only limits Government. If Mary Washington University is a private school then they can have any rules they want, as absurd as these are. If they receive Government money that may be a different issue.

  • How much do you want to bet that Mary Washington University gets a lot of government money?

  • Edward

    From the article: “No student on this campus should feel unsafe, ostracized, or threatened.”

    I guess that does not apply if the student on that campus is part of a team sport. How likely is it that the innocent members of the team are not being ostracized? How likely is it that all the other teams on campus feel threatened by this unfair punishment.

    And how threatened did the women who were not at the party feel during the chant? Or afterward, for that matter (since none were there at the time)? It is most likely that they never felt threatened but are (mis)using the system to threaten others into silence.

    So much for upholding the UMW values. They are applied to the team, but they are ignored when the team and others feel threatened into silence. The university may have no legal requirement to uphold the First Amendment, but its students have the right (and expectation) that their rights will be protected.

    From the article: “Some students have now been exposed to those offensive and lurid lyrics due to posting by others on social media.”

    Have the students who posted the supposedly threatening lyrics likewise been punished? Perhaps the punishment is being unfairly applied all around, punishing the guilty and the innocent, but none of those guilty of continuing to spread the supposed threats.

    When a student is not free to express himself in a private residence, off campus, and away from anyone who might be offended, what freedoms of expression does he really have?

    When a student is not free to express offensive thoughts, what freedoms of expression does he really have? It is only the offensive expressions that have to be protected. Otherwise all conversation would have to revolve around the weather (and even *that* is becoming a political — thus potentially offensive — topic).

Readers: the rules for commenting!


No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.


However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.


Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *