Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

 
Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.

 

“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.

 

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.


Connecticut locks all train bathrooms because half are not ADA compliant

The coming dark age: Because of a complaint, Hartford officials have locked all bathrooms on a new train line because half are not ADA compliant.

Restrooms on half of the Hartford Line trains — those operated by the state as opposed to Amtrak — will remain closed until they are made accessible to individuals with disabilities in early 2019, the state Department of Transportation announced Tuesday. The closure comes in response to a reversed decision from the Federal Railroad Administration, which had previously granted the state a temporary exemption from the Americans for Disabilities Act, according to the DOT.

Disability Rights Connecticut, a nonprofit advocacy group for state residents with disabilities, said it filed an ADA complaint with the FRA on June 8 regarding the new commuter line, which is scheduled to open June 16.

In other words, because a small number of people are unhappy, no one can be happy. They rule, and if they don’t get what they want then no one will get anything.

Readers!
 

My July fund-raising campaign for 2021 has now ended. Thank you all for your donations and subscriptions. While this year’s campaign was not as spectacular as last year’s, it was the second best July campaign since I began this website.


And if you have not yet donated or subscribed, and you think what I write here is worth your support, you can still do so. I depend on this support to remain independent and free to write what I believe, without any pressure from others. Nor do I accept advertisements, or use oppressive social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.


If you choose to help, you can contribute via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:
 


 

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

5 comments

  • Edward

    Robert,
    You make it sound like the kid who says, “if I can’t have it my way, then I’m taking my baseball home with me.”

    Wait. That is exactly what it is like.

    Welcome to the bureaucracy, where brains get thrown out the window (defenestrated).

    It reminds me of a popular burger joint near me, which had been built on a small odd-sized lot. There was barely any parking, and none that could be converted into an accessible space. Someone complained, so the little restaurant had to close down due to lack of ability to comply with the ADA. One disabled person was inconvenienced a bit when he went for a burger, so now no one can have a burger.

    It reminds me of the unsuccessful lawsuit against Clint Eastwood’s Mission Ranch restaurant. A member of the disability community thought that it was unfair that to get to the only accessible restroom was to go 10 meters outside, but the courts agreed that the restaurant had made a restroom accessible, even if getting to it required going outside, so the Mission Ranch still exists. Come to think of it, I have been to plenty of fast food places and gas stations where the restroom was outside and around the corner.

    Due to unreasonable complaints and lawsuits such as these, I am not as much of a fan of the ADA as I was when it was signed into law. It seems to me that there are lawyers just out for a buck and “children” who take their baseball home and leave the rest of us disappointed.

    Or, in the case of the Hartford Line’s CTrail trains, leaving us hoping that we can make it to the next station with a restroom. (Is that a trickle down my leg, or did I just become an Obama fan, like Chris Matthews?)

  • Robert Pratt

    … “because a small number of people are unhappy, no one can be happy.” That so well sums up how socialism turns out, always.

  • B.E. Blue

    Related legal query for our Connecticut brethren – please cite the specific legal authority allowing the closure of public bathrooms. I suspect there isn’t any so no action should have been taken.

  • FC

    Does urinary or rectal incontinence qualify for ADA protection? Asking for a large class of people who I hope will sue the state of Connecticut into bankruptcy.

  • Edward

    B.E. Blue wrote: “Related legal query for our Connecticut brethren – please cite the specific legal authority allowing the closure of public bathrooms. I suspect there isn’t any so no action should have been taken.

    The United States works differently than the rest of the world. American liberty allows us to do things unless they are expressly forbidden. The up side is an amazing amount of freedom; the down side is that there has to be a law for virtually every action that harms another, such as mail fraud, wire fraud, etc. rather than just making fraud in general illegal. It can take the legislature a while to catch up with new ways to harm other people’s rights.

    Rather than needing an authority to allow the closure of a restroom, we need a law that prevents the closure of a restroom.

    The restrooms on the trains are not exactly open to the public, as access to them requires the purchase of a ticket. It is similar to a restroom aboard a passenger plane, it is not open to members of the general public who are not ticketed to be on the airplane, even when the plane is at the gate.

    There may not be a legal requirement for restrooms on commuter trains. There are no restrooms on my local commuter train.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *