Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

 
Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.

 

“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.

 

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.


Dawn resumes descent to Ceres

After a several week pause while engineers analyzed the issue that caused the spacecraft to go into safe mode on June 30, they have now resumed their descent to a lower orbit to take higher resolution images of Ceres.

The spacecraft experienced a discrepancy in its expected orientation on June 30, triggering a safe mode. Engineers traced this anomaly to the mechanical gimbal system that swivels ion engine #3 to help control the spacecraft’s orientation during ion-thrusting. Dawn has three ion engines and uses only one at a time. Dawn’s engineering team switched to ion engine #2, which is mounted on a different gimbal, and conducted tests with it from July 14 to 16. They have confirmed that the spacecraft is ready to continue with the exploration of Ceres.

Readers!
 

I must unfortunately ask you for your financial support because I do not depend on ads and rely entirely on the generosity of readers to keep Behind the Black running. You can either make a one time donation for whatever amount you wish, or you sign up for a monthly subscription ranging from $2 to $15 through Paypal or $3 to $50 through Patreon.


Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.


Your support is even more essential to me because I not only keep this site free from advertisements, I do not use the corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook to promote my work. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.


You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:
 


 

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
 

Or you can donate by using Zelle through your bank. You will need to give my name and email address (found at the bottom of the "About" page). The best part of this electronic option is that no fees will be deducted! What you donate will be what I receive.

3 comments

  • Gealon

    I never could understand why in all of the art and diagrams of Dawn that it had those three engines mounted in three different orientations. Now even more bafflingly I see here that two of them are gimbaled??? Redundancy aside, what is the point of having three engines doing the job of one other then to make the craft more expensive?

    If they needed to point the engine to maintain a certain facing of the spacecraft for the instruments while thrusting I can understand the off-axis engines, but then why not simply use a single engine that can gimbal in both directions? It would reduce weight and complexity as well as increase the craft’s performance.

    If redundancy is really what predicated using more then one engine, then why not use two like on Cassini? When one engine is thrusting the other is just dead weight, but they went with a design that has two dead engines. This bit of new information has left me even more confused then before.

  • Edward

    Good question. Strange answer:
    http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/dawn/spacecraft/index_prt.htm
    “A total of three ion propulsion engines are required to provide enough thruster lifetime to complete the mission and still have adequate reserve.”

    Thruster lifetime means that they were worried that a single thruster would not last long enough to perform the entire mission of visiting two asteroids. Thrusters have a design lifetime, but I am not familiar enough with them to know what wears out over time. The third thruster may or may not have been for redundancy.

    Although they provide low levels of thrust (they wouldn’t get you off a planet), ion engines are useful in space because they are fuel efficient. Engineers and rocket scientists call rocket efficiency “specific impulse” (Isp), which is measured in seconds. Although they came up with that unit of efficiency from a weird ratio, you can easily think of it as the number of seconds that a thruster could produce one ounce of thrust while using one ounce of propellant.

    Ion engines have an Isp in the thousands of seconds. A launch rocket’s chemical engine has an Isp somewhere around 300 seconds, so the ion engine is somewhere around ten times more efficient than the chemical engine. Since the probe only needs about a tenth as much fuel as if it had used conventional chemical engines, there was more weight available for instruments, or more likely, there was more weight available for enough fuel to visit the second asteroid.

  • Gealon

    Mmmm. The limited life expectancy of the engines probably has something to do with the electron gun used to balance the charge of the Xenon after it leaves the engine. If memory serves, the engines operate by stripping the electrons off of the Xenon atoms, giving them a positive charge. the atoms are then repelled out of the rear of the engine and a rear facing electron gun returns electrons to the atoms to rebalance their charge so they don’t get attracted back to the spacecraft. The gun is essentially an open ended vacuum tube so I can see it eventually wearing out. Likewise I remember DS1 having trouble with dust getting between its high voltage grids and Hyabusa was plagued with all sorts of problems.

    Thanks Edward for the info.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *