Facebook updates privacy policy to simply read “LOL”

For many reasons, mostly political but partly ethical, I do not use Google, Facebook, Twitter. They practice corrupt business policies, while targeting conservative websites for censoring, facts repeatedly confirmed by news stories and by my sense that Facebook has taken action to prevent my readers from recommending Behind the Black to their friends.
Thus, I must have your direct support to keep this webpage alive. Not only does the money pay the bills, it gives me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.


Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.


Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:

If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

News you can use! Facebook has replaced its long and complex privacy policy to the simple three letter term “LOL.”

“We wanted to be more forthright with our users,” Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg told reporters. “We could give you this boring tome of legalese, or we could simply put it in terms everyone can understand. The popular internet abbreviation for ‘laughing out loud’ is an accurate, concise summary of how we feel about your private data.”

“It’s short, sweet, and to the point,” he added.

Users joining the site for the first time are asked to read the three-letter privacy policy in its entirety before clicking “accept” to acknowledge that the social networking company just laughs its collective keister off at the notion of any Facebook user having any kind of privacy whatsoever.

It is said that for humor to work, it must be based on truth. I think this is a good example.



  • Lee S

    An amusing Micky-take, but to be fair…. I find Facebook a useful tool for keeping in contact with friends and family over the globe, and I am totally happy with them having the information on me that they have… I never share anything or state anything I wouldn’t in “real life”, and to be honest, I have bought a couple of items that have popped up in my Facebook and Instagram feeds…
    I feel that the use of Facebook and their data mining of my “likes” is a fair trade off…
    Admittedly many people are unaware of the bargain they are signing by clicking “yes”… but anything that keeps me in contact with my freinds and fam back in the U.K. In such a real time fashion, and also keeps me in contact with my like minded peers, and honestly keeps me in discussion with those I disagree with , is not a bad thing..,
    More contact intellectually with other thinkers is generally a good thing…. and as long as everyone knows we are the resource that makes “free” internet services profitable, I see no problems…
    Conduct yourself the same on the internet as you would in your local bar…. no problems…

  • Lee S.:

    Well said.

    “. . . and as long as everyone knows we are the resource that makes “free” internet services profitable. . .”

    A salient point and routinely overlooked. The online privacy war has been fought and lost. I do, however, feel slightly more secure abut my data with private companies than I do with government.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *