Scroll down to read this post.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. I keep the website clean from pop-ups and annoying demands. Instead, I depend entirely on my readers to support me. Though this means I am sacrificing some income, it also means that I remain entirely independent from outside pressure. By depending solely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, no one can threaten me with censorship. You don't like what I write, you can simply go elsewhere.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:


5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.


General Atomics wins Air Force contract to build technology test lunar satellite

General Atomics yesterday announced that it has been awarded an Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) contract to build a satellite to test a variety of technologies in near lunar space.

The AFRL Oracle spacecraft program is intended to demonstrate advanced techniques to detect and track objects in the region near the Moon that cannot be viewed optically from the Earth or from satellites in traditional orbits such as geosynchronous earth orbit (GEO). The anticipated launch date for the Oracle spacecraft is late 2025.

While this is good business for General Atomics, the company is not selling its product to the Air Force, but building what the Air Force wants, making the spacecraft government owned. This is how the space industry functioned in the United States for almost a half century after Apollo, generally accomplishing little for great cost. Much better in the long run if the military bought this kind of product from private companies, who developed it for profit and for sale not just to the military.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 
The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

5 comments

  • MDN

    In general I agree, but major infrastructure typically starts as a government initiative and becomes a commercially outsourced resource once a viable private sector market emerges. And that does not always happen. This strikes me as quite analogous to building Air Traffic Control and Earth Orbit tracking and control, both of which are still primarily government driven because they must be 24/7/365 reliable and require regulation to constrain chaos. Weather and Earth Resource monitoring have moved past the government only model, but only because they are not as subject o these requirements and other lucrative customers for these services exist.

    With development on the moon an obvious Next Step we are going to pursue, establishing a good handle on orbital debris and vehicles we need to track in the region is a good idea. And with any luck they will find the Eagle too and we’ll have an opportunity to save it for capture and return to the Smithsonian some day.

  • George C

    Historically Dual Use technology was often the result of civilian initiative first. The Taxis of the Marne ran in WWI with the taxi meter running. Farm equipment was first to use what became tank tracks, 1904 Caterpillar. Aircraft, telephone, radio, all civilian first

    Of couse now we have big science and so often military funding first.

    But Dual Use is so very important even now for being cost effective and building industrial might. With ITAR and NOFORN controls of course.

    The subtle force is the ownership aspect that Zimmerman [Robert, not the WWI telegram guy] emphasized.

    Over time Dual Use and private ownership, initiative and risk are the only sustainable way to go.

  • pzatchok

    I wonder what secret tech the military needs to test in Lunar orbit that can not be tested in Earth orbit?

  • Mitch S.

    My guess is this is about the AF/Space Force tracking Chinese activity.
    They would want to keep knowledge of
    such capabilities closely held.

  • Max

    pzatchok;
    Everything that is dangerous and experimental will need to be tested in 0G of lunar orbit. New drugs and dangerous compounds, as well as experimentation with nuclear devices cannot be performed where there’s a possibility of falling back to earth and infecting earth. (Another Wuhan pathogen for example)
    But then you knew this, you asked the question to make people think… “what’s really going on?”
    Where private companies will build, improve, innovate, advance capabilities towards a particular goal using technologies developed just for this purpose thereby succeeding where none other has before…

    The military only concerns are how do we defend ourselves from threats, what new tools can we use for this purpose. How do we control the threat, and if control is not possible, how do we eliminate the threat. What is the enemy planning? And how do we counter that threat.
    An entirely different objective for different reasons. And there is no higher ground than lunar orbit. You cannot destroy a enemy you you cannot see.
    Military platforms in geosynchronous are vulnerable… Perhaps this is a checkmate move? My imagination tends to run away with me. Watching too many movies with AI in them lately.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *