House proposes to drop NASA’s budget to 2008 levels, eliminate Webb Telescope


Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 
The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit.

 
The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs." --San Antonio Express-News

The House today proposed cutting NASA’s budget back to 2008 levels while eliminating all funds for the James Webb Space Telescope.

As much as I’d hate to see the Webb telescope die, it has cost far more than planned, is way behind schedule, and carries a gigantic risk of failure. However, if I had a choice, I’d rather they cut the $1.95 billion for Congress’s homemade heavy-lift rocket, the program-formerly-called-Constellation. There is a much better chance that Webb will get completed, launched, and work, than there is for this improvised and impossibly costly Congressionally conceived rocket.

Readers!
 

My July fund-raiser for Behind the Black is now over. The support from my readers was unprecedented, making this July campaign the best ever, twice over. What a marvelous way to celebrate the website's tenth anniversary!
 

Thank you! The number of donations in July, and continuing now at the beginning of August, is too many for me to thank you all personally. Please forgive me by accepting my thank you here, in public, on the website.
 

If you did not donate or subscribe in July and still wish to, note that the tip jar remains available year round.


 

Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

3 comments

  • I just had this conversation:

    fan: save JWST!
    Me: Why? If you believe mismanaged programs should be cancelled, then why do you have a problem with cancelling JWST?
    fan: we need JWST, it’s the successor to the Hubble. We need it, and it’s cool, and it supplies lots of jobs and it inspires kids.
    Me: Right, so that doesn’t matter that it is twice over-budget and slipping 5 years every 2 years? So long as it is cool, provides jobs and inspires kids, we don’t need good management!
    fan: well, umm, do we know it is mismanaged? JWST is on the cutting edge of space technology and it’s not easy to do cutting edge stuff.
    Me: The GAO report said all the technical issues were solved and the problems are with management.
    fan: There was a GAO report? Oh… but, that’s no reason to cancel it! They should just replace the management!
    Me: Yes, that’s what the GAO said NASA should do too.. even the journalists on the conference call asked who was going to be fired.
    fan: Then why are they cancelling it?
    Me: Because NASA didn’t fire anyone. NASA never fires anyone. Now Congress is actually doing what they’re supposed to do. It’s called “oversight”.

  • ZZMike

    Do we even have a way to put into orbit? Maybe we could ask the Russians, or the Chinese.

    And the launch has to be 100% – not 6 or 7 “9s”. If it fails …..

    Why is it so much over budget? Is it because we did the estimates in 1998 dollars,( for example), and now it’s 2011, and the old green dollar ain’t what she used to be? Or, more likely in those kinds of program, “requirements creep”?

    (At least, this time, they’ll probably do a real good test on the optics before they launch it.)

    Unfortunately, “being cool” is not quite reason enough to spend a few billion $$. Even so, the $1.7 or so billion yet to be spent would trim the national deficit by almost an entire percent.

    I saw the video graphic. The tolerances have to be amazingly tight – not to mention that it first has to be put on the launch vehicle, undergo at least several seconds of 3 or 4 G, then get dumped into the cold vacuum of space, and the direct Sun’s rays.

    A followup question is, there’s got to be a lot of hardware already built; what’ll happen to that? Keep it in cold storage until maybe there’s a “go”? Dump it on the surplus market? The sensors alone should be worth a few million $$.

  • What’s really annoying is all these people coming out of the woodwork demanding that we “save JWST” who have never even heard of JWST before now. They certainly haven’t heard about the inept management that got us to this point. They just want their rattle.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *