Scroll down to read this post.

 

My February birthday fund-raising campaign for Behind the Black it now over. I sincerely and with deep gratitude thank all those who donated. Without your support I could not keep doing this, not so much because of the need for income to pay the bills, but because it tells me that there are people out there who want me to do this work. For those who did not contribute during the campaign, please consider adding your vote of support to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, in any one of the following ways:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Donate through Gabpay, using my email address zimmerman @ nasw dot org.
 

3. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

4. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:


5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


Hubble looks at a nearby dwarf galaxy

A nearby dwarf galaxy
Click for original image.

Cool image time! The photo to the right, cropped, reduced, and sharpened to post here, was taken by the Hubble Space Telescope as part of a continuing project to capture high resolution images of every nearby galaxy, which in this particular case the caption describes as follows:

UGCA 307 hangs against an irregular backdrop of distant galaxies in this image from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope. The small galaxy consists of a diffuse band of stars containing red bubbles of gas that mark regions of recent star formation, and lies roughly 26 million light-years from Earth in the constellation Corvus. Appearing as just a small patch of stars, UGCA 307 is a diminutive dwarf galaxy without a defined structure — resembling nothing more than a hazy patch of passing cloud.

The red regions of star formation are significant, as they indicate that even in a tiny galaxy like this it is possible for there to be enough gas and dust to coalesce into new stars.

Astronomers living on a world inside this galaxy have an advantage over astronomers on Earth. There is no large galaxy like the Milky Way blocking their view of the cosmos in one direction. They can see it all, even in directions looking through UGCA 307.

Conscious Choice cover

Now available in hardback and paperback as well as ebook!

 

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

 
Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.

 

“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.

 

All editions are available at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all book vendors, with the ebook priced at $5.99 before discount. The ebook can also be purchased direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit, in which case you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.

 

Autographed printed copies are also available at discount directly from me (hardback $24.95; paperback $14.95; Shipping cost for either: $5.00). Just email me at zimmerman @ nasw dot org.

11 comments

  • Steve Richter

    Do galaxies shrink or expand over time?

    And galaxies are not like the larger universe in that galaxies do not orbit around the center of the universe, correct?

    But the direction a galaxy is moving is not radially from the center of the universe since Andromeda and the Milky Way are moving on a collision course. Kind of confusing.

    Has Hubble seen any stars which are on their own, not orbiting a galaxy?

  • Steve Richter: Present theory about the evolution of galaxies is that they grow as they absorb smaller galaxies around them.

  • Edward

    Steve Richter asked: “And galaxies are not like the larger universe in that galaxies do not orbit around the center of the universe, correct?

    Correct. The current model (which could change due to JWST observations) is that there is no center to the universe, which means that every point is the center of the universe. The next time you say that someone thinks that he is the center of the universe, keep this in mind; although he may be egotistical, he is right.

    But the direction a galaxy is moving is not radially from the center of the universe since Andromeda and the Milky Way are moving on a collision course. Kind of confusing.

    As the universe expands (again, current model), the clusters of galaxies tend to move apart. The galaxies within each cluster can move independently or even collide, and they tend to form a center of mass that they don’t drift too far from. If one were drifting too far, then it could be moving at a velocity beyond the escape velocity for that cluster, and that galaxy could end up on its own in the universe.

    Some clusters could also be drifting closer together, but the model and the observations tell us that the farther apart the clusters are, the more likely that they are drifting apart.

    The universe is a strange and mysterious place. We understand things that we experience on our own scale, and we call this understanding “classical physics” or sometimes Newtonian physics. Atoms and the particles that made up atoms behave differently, and we call these behaviors particle physics and quantum mechanics. We observe strange things that are hard to explain on the scale of galaxies and the scale of the universe, and that is called astrophysics. Dark matter and Dark energy are two things that astrophysicists have deduced to explain a couple of the observed mysteries.

    In the past year, the James Webb telescope has returned data that contradicts the model of the universe that astrophysicists made over the past century, confounding them. There will undoubtedly be a decade or more of argument and bickering until the field is able to once again come to a general agreement. This is yet another example of how science is never settled, that everything we know to be right and true is wrong; it is just that we don’t know it, yet.

    There was a time, a century ago, when we thought that light waves propagated through the ether (also: aether), like waves on a lake. Ether was something that physicists deduced to explain the wave-like behavior of light. The concept of ether went away when quantum mechanics showed us how light waves can propagate without a medium, sort of like those waves on the lake but without the water. As I said, a strange and mysterious place.

  • wayne

    The Mechanical Universe
    Ep 41: The Michelson Morley Experiment
    https://youtu.be/Ip_jdcA8fcw
    29:02

  • John

    Wayne good stuff. You probably just cost me a lot of time with that caltec series. Old school college lecture, thick glasses, professor in nerdy business dress, chalkboard, wow, cheezy but effective cartoonish illustrations, just wow. The history and personification of the experiment was well done. I do not want my 29 minutes back.

    I never knew the Lorentz transformations came from explaining Michelson Morley. I thought I remembered from collage the Lorentz transformation were derived from Relativity. I knew Einstein claimed not to know of Michelson Morley, and caltec covered that like a cliffhanger. I always suspected Einstein had to have known.

  • Steve Richter

    “… The current model (which could change due to JWST observations) is that there is no center to the universe, which means that every point is the center of the universe. …”

    There being no center of the universe would explain why the background radiation is still detectable on Earth. Common sense says the radiation should be gone like a blast wave of an explosion that emanates from ground zero.

    Without a universe center doesn’t that mean galaxy clusters are moving in random directions, independent of each other? But Edwin Hubble saw the distant galaxies moving away from us. Are there galaxy clusters moving in the opposite direction of our local group galaxy cluster, on a collision course with the local group?

  • Edward

    Without a universe center doesn’t that mean galaxy clusters are moving in random directions, independent of each other? But Edwin Hubble saw the distant galaxies moving away from us. Are there galaxy clusters moving in the opposite direction of our local group galaxy cluster, on a collision course with the local group?

    Not really. The expansion of the universe means that everything is moving with the expansion and generally getting farther and farther away from us and everything else (even the ether and the dark matter, although the hypothesis is that the universe is expanding into a supply of dark energy, and the gain of all that energy provides the power to cause the observed increasing expansion rate).

    The theory was developed because farther galaxies appeared to be receding away from us, the farther the faster, and it someone were to run in reverse a film of all this motion, then the film would show everything getting closer and closer until it all became one tiny blob of energy. The tiny blob would be the entire universe, which would be an inch in diameter, not many, many light years in diameter.

    The generally accepted model of the universe is based upon the universe beginning as a tiny blob of enormous energy, suddenly expanding in a Big Bang, and all of space, time, mass, laws of physics, morals, ethics, and fattening foods were carried along with it as it expanded. Eventually, all that energy condensed into the matter that we see around us, and the microwave background radiation continues to exist Everywhere All at Once, if I may use a truncated movie title for effect.

    Not only is each point in the universe the center of the uncentered universe, it is also where the universe began as a small ball.

    Other models have been tried, including one in which the Earth was on the back of a large tortoise, which was resting on another tortoise, which was resting on another tortoise, which was tortoises all the way down. Feel free to choose your favorite model, because the Big Bang Theory is being questioned almost as much as the model with tortoises all the way down. I’m sticking with the Big Bang Theory, but only because I get to be the center of the universe and the source of the universe, which revolves (or expands) around me, and everyone is required to acknowledge that undeniable fact.

  • wayne

    John–
    All the “Mechanical Universe” lectures are available on YT.
    Highly recommend them for home-schooling, or just plain old good times.
    (and while I’m at it– highly recommend the multiple David Butler series for home-schooling– these were made for educational purposes (HS level), and they have classroom aids. )
    Now, if you want hours of intense Math, I suggest the Leonard Susskind lectures.
    –>
    “All Leonard Susskind Stanford lectures, in order”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyX8kQ-JzHI&list=PL6i60qoDQhQGaGbbg-4aSwXJvxOqO6o5e

    Steve–
    It helps to think of all this as…..We are inside an expanding sphere of Space. The ‘big bang’ was not an explosion per se and can be best thought of as a moment in Time and not a physical location in Space.

  • wayne

    Sturgill Simpson –
    “Turtles All The Way Down” (2014)
    https://youtu.be/6gBV-Nzq7Pg
    3:05
    (Psychedelic Country…)

    Sean Carroll
    The Biggest Ideas in the Universe
    #22: Cosmology
    https://youtu.be/tZQadPmTd84
    1:59:14
    (and there is a 90 minute Q&A follow up available.)

  • Star Bird

    Hubble’s operating again? and Dwarf Galaxy with teeny tiny planets inhabited by Teeny Tiny Animals and People

  • Speaking of Edwin Hubble, as well as dwarf galaxies, not to speak of how we know that there are other galaxies, way back in 1925 (98 years ago), Hubble observed the following in a paper in Astrophysical Journal: [quoting…]

    The present investigation [using Cepheid variables for the first time as an indicator of distances beyond the Magellanic clouds] identifies NGC 6822 as an isolated system of stars and nebulae of the same type as the Magellanic clouds, although somewhat smaller and much more distant. A consistent structure is thus reared on the foundation of the Cepheid criterion, in which the dimensions, luminosities, and densities, both of the system [NGC 6822] as a whole and its separate members, are of orders of magnitude which are thoroughly familiar. The distance is the only quantity of a new order. The principle of the uniformity of nature thus seems to rule undisturbed in this remote region of space.

    [/unQuote]
    ____
    (Edwin P. Hubble, “NGC 6822, a remote stellar system,” Astrophys. J. 62 (1925), 409-433.)

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *