Readers!
 

Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.


 

Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:
 


 

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


Hubble’s wide field camera returns to operation

Though the Hubble Space Telescope returned to science operations on March 12th after going into safe mode, its wide field camera did not.

Engineers however now report that they have successfully restored the camera to operations as well. The reason for the delayed restoration exemplifies Hubble’s aging status.

Analysis showed that voltage levels in WFC3 power supplies have slowly decreased over time as their electronics aged. The electronics experience colder temperatures when the hardware is turned off in safe mode. This factor coupled with the power the instrument components draw as they are turned back on contributed to the small voltage fluctuation that suspended WFC3 recovery operations. Further detailed analysis indicated that it would be safe to slightly reduce the low voltage limit to avoid a future suspend, and it would be safe to recover the instrument to its science state.

The instrument has now been safely recovered. Standard calibration of the instrument and other pre-observation activities will be conducted this week.

All the telescope’s equipment has been adjusted in recent years to deal with the varying ages of its instruments and its main structure. For example, this wide field camera was installed during the last shuttle serving mission in 2009, and is therefore one of Hubble’s newest components. It however is now more than a decade old, and thus needs careful handling to function properly.

Other components are far older, such as the primary motor to open and close the telescope’s “lens cap”. That failed during this safe mode, forcing engineers to switch to a back up motor to control the cap. Whether they can recover that primary motor is presently unclear, though unlikely.

Expect more such issues in the coming years.

Pioneer cover

From the press release: From the moment he is handed a possibility of making the first alien contact, Saunders Maxwell decides he will do it, even if doing so takes him through hell and back.

 
Unfortunately, that is exactly where that journey takes him.

The vision that Zimmerman paints of vibrant human colonies on the Moon, Mars, the asteroids, and beyond, indomitably fighting the harsh lifeless environment of space to build new societies, captures perfectly the emerging space race we see today.

He also captures in Pioneer the heart of the human spirit, willing to push forward no matter the odds, no matter the cost. It is that spirit that will make the exploration of the heavens possible, forever, into the never-ending future.

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at amazon, Barnes & Noble, all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.

7 comments

  • Steve Richter

    OT: story linked from Drudge today https://www.accuweather.com/en/space-news/massive-piece-of-space-junk-tossed-from-iss-sets-record/916013
    In regard to jetitisoning something from the ISS and sending it back to earth … if a person throws a ball from the ISS towards the Earth, would the ball stay in orbit? Or would it move at the rate and direction it was thrown, and pretty quickly fall to earth? ( which I guess also begs the question, can you throw a fastball on the ISS? )

  • Andi

    If you throw a ball from ISS directly towards the Earth, remember that the ISS (and hence the ball) is traveling at some 17,000 mph in orbit. Assuming you are a major league pitcher and throw the ball at 100mph at the earth, the ball’s resultant velocity will be the vector sum of 17,000 horizontally and 100 vertically. It will just assume a slightly different orbit than the ISS.

  • Steve Richter

    “… the ball’s resultant velocity will be the vector sum of 17,000 horizontally and 100 vertically. It will just assume a slightly different orbit than the ISS. …”

    I follow that the ball is orbiting the earth, just as the ISS is. Just do not understand why the ball does not not continue moving toward the earth at 100 mph.

  • wayne

    Steve / Andi

    -> I believe this is very enlightening. Manley discusses this exact situation in the first 5 minutes. (and, check out the math at around the 3:40 mark.)
    ((I can barely conceptualize orbital mechanics myself!))

    “The Most Confusing Things About Spacecraft Orbits”
    Scott Manley
    May 2018
    https://youtu.be/i5XPFjqPLik
    11:07

  • Edward

    Steve Richter asked: “if a person throws a ball from the ISS towards the Earth, would the ball stay in orbit?

    Scott Manley’s video was the first thing that came to my mind, but wayne beat me to it. Keep in mind that every maneuver in space only changes the orbit. Manley’s video shows that the original downward motion of the ball turns into an upward motion half an orbit later. That is a good way to think about orbits when you don’t want to do the math.

    The reason for a ball to reach the Earth would be for the new orbit to have a low point, perigee, that is inside the atmosphere or that intersects the surface. As Manley pointed out, this would be about 1/4 orbit away from the point where the ball was thrown.

    There is a lot that is counterintuitive about orbital mechanics, making space navigation even trickier than Earth-bound navigation. If you view the video Manley references early on, you will get a little more information, specifically about throwing things in the retrograde direction, against the direction of the orbital motion.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxNJoaBLLNM (8 minutes, “Could An Astronaut Throw Something From Orbit To Earth?”)

  • Steve Richter

    thanks for the Scott Manley link. Fascinating. Still do not understand.

    Maybe it helps me to think of a space craft travelling from Earth to Mars. But the straight line course of the craft takes it past Mars. As it passes Mars, the straight line course will be bent by Mar’s gravity. The further from Mars as it passes by, the less the course will be affected. And the closer the craft is to Mars as it passes by, the more the course will be bent. Too close and it starts to orbit, but then flings out at close to a 90 degree angle? But far enough away as the craft passes Mars and it will be captured into the orbit of the planet?

    Back to the ball and the space craft … if a ball is thrown from the craft at a 90 degree angle, that would put the ball in either a closer or further out orbit as both the craft and the ball pass by Mars.

    Not asking for an answer. Just thinking out loud.

  • Edward

    Steve Richter,
    Thinking in straight lines is misleading. Even traveling from Earth to Mars, the Sun’s gravity curves the path into an ellipse around the Sun. It adds to the complexity of the calculation to reach Mars.

    When something approaches from far away and is not in orbit around the planet, it requires a change in velocity in order to enter into an orbit around Mars. For our probes, this often occurs due to firing thrusters, but it can also happen by using Mars’s atmosphere to slow down to enter into an elliptical orbit. Without this change, the object would remain in a hyperbolic orbit, which does not go around the planet, in which it comes from far away and leaves to go far away again, just in a different direction.

    In this video, Astronaut Chris Hadfield gives a basic lesson in orbits, with the second part talking about docking with a space station:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PooFvQEN4n8 (16 minutes)

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *