Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

 
Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.

 

“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.

 

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.


Israel launches reconnaissance satellite

In its first launch since 2016, Israel yesterday successfully used its Shavit rocket to place a military reconnaissance satellite into orbit.

This was also Israel’s ninth successful launch since it completed its first in 1988. The country has averaged about one launch every four years since, almost of of which have been military reconnaissance satellites. Generally, the pattern has been for Israeli commercial satellites to get launched by other commercial rocket companies, leaving the military launches to Shavit.

The leaders in the 2020 launch race remain unchanged:

15 China
10 SpaceX
7 Russia
3 ULA

The U.S. leads China 16 to 15 in the national rankings.

Readers!
 

I must unfortunately ask you for your financial support because I do not depend on ads and rely entirely on the generosity of readers to keep Behind the Black running. You can either make a one time donation for whatever amount you wish, or you sign up for a monthly subscription ranging from $2 to $15 through Paypal or $3 to $50 through Patreon.


Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.


Your support is even more essential to me because I not only keep this site free from advertisements, I do not use the corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook to promote my work. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.


You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:
 


 

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
 

Or you can donate by using Zelle through your bank. You will need to give my name and email address (found at the bottom of the "About" page). The best part of this electronic option is that no fees will be deducted! What you donate will be what I receive.

7 comments

  • mkent

    This was also Israel’s eleven successful launch since it completed its first in 1988.

    Eleventh launch overall, but according to Wikipedia, the launches of Ofeks 4 & 6 failed in 1998 & 2004, respectively. Or are you counting something else?

  • mkent: I am counting what I have tracked of successful launches. The data comes from multiple space sources such as SpaceflightNow, the Space Launch Report, and the Encyclopedia Astronautica, to name a few. Wikipedia can be useful but as a source I would not rely on it solely.

  • mkent

    So which flights are you rating as a success, and which flights are you rating as a failure? Wikipedia lists them thus:

    Variant Launch Date Payload Status
    Shavit 19 Sep 1988 Ofek-1 Success
    Shavit 03 Apr 1990 Ofek-2 Success
    Shavit-1 05 Apr 1995 Ofek-3 Success
    Shavit-1 22 Jan 1998 Ofek-4 Failure
    Shavit-1 28 May 2002 Ofek-5 Success
    Shavit-1 06 Sep 2004 Ofek-6 Failure
    Shavit-2 11 Jun 2007 Ofek-7 Success
    Shavit-2 22 Jun 2010 Ofek-9 Success
    Shavit-2 09 Apr 2014 Ofek-10 Success
    Shavit-2 13 Sep 2016 Ofek-11 Success

    This jives with Encyclopedia Astronautica. The Space Launch Report also agrees with this except that it adds an unacknowledged test flight in 1994 as a failed orbital launch attempt while noting that it could have been a suborbital test, possibly of a different vehicle. All three sources agree on eight previous successful launches and which ones they were.

  • geoffc

    Also always worth pointing out they are the only orbiter booster who launches retrograde, against the earth’s revolution. Crazy Israelis, just launch west over the middle east, what could go wrong? China and Russia don’t seem to care if they drop a hydrazine burning stage on a village all that much.

  • mkent: I did some rechecking and find you are correct. I had listed the 1998 and 2004 launches as successes when they were not.

    I appreciate the zeal in which you check up on my work. Only makes it better. I will correct the post.

  • mkent

    Checking up on your work? No, not really. It’s just that the Shavit launch record was something I knew from memory, so when your figure didn’t match, I looked it up to make sure my memory wasn’t failing. I was thinking a few weeks ago they were overdue for another launch. We’re cool.

  • mkent: My thanks were sincere. I always like to get things right, and since I write so much, and have no copy-editor or fact-checker, having my readers help in those capacities is very much appreciated.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *