Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

 
Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.

 

“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.

 

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.


July 6, 2018 Zimmerman/Batchelor podcast

Embedded below the fold. I did this podcast from Belize, using the office of Maya Mountain Lodge, where I was staying. The management there has been very gracious each year to allow me to do this.

During the podcast I spent some time describing the cave project, for those who might be interested in hearing some details.

Readers!
 

Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.


Your support is even more essential to me because I keep this site free from advertisements and do not participate in corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.


You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:
 


 

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

3 comments

  • Edward

    Robert,
    I see additional differences between Virgin Orbit and Virgin Galactic.

    1) Virgin Galactic is producing a manned rocket, which requires far more safety assurances than for Virgin Orbit. This makes it harder to do and would be expected to take longer. After their accident in 2014 they are most likely being even more careful with safety issues.

    2) Virgin Galactic also chose, early on, a hybrid rocket engine, which comes with a problem that is inherent in solid rockets: it can act like a pipe organ in that there is a natural frequency for the gasses within the rocket body. Virgin Orbit is using a liquid fuel rocket.

    The hybrid rocket engine’s natural frequency changes as the fuel is expended and the combustion cavity increases in size or diameter. The engine may or may not vibrate at this natural frequency, but that vibration would be transferred to the payload and other sections of the rocket. This kind of potential vibration was one problem that the Constellation Program’s Ares rocket had.

    This can be a major safety issue, because human bodies also have natural frequencies of different parts of the body. Individual internal organs can vibrate at around 20 or so hertz. Strong vibrations from 8 to 80 hertz can be bad for humans, as body functions can be impaired, bones can break or separate from each other, and organs can mash against each other until they are mush. The spinal column is also vulnerable. Certain sounds, such as helicopter rotor chop, can be strongly felt in the chest and body; even sonic vibration can induce sympathetic vibrations in the body.
    https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/37543/does-the-human-body-have-a-resonant-frequency-if-so-how-strong-is-it (Please note that the values in the figure have not been fact-checked, but it gives an example of a model.)

    http://www.donmar.com/Tech/VIBRATION-BODY.pdf

    The structure of the rocket can also be badly affected by vibrations, as even the rocket parts have their own natural frequencies. Either these frequencies must be avoided or the rocket parts must be beefed up (read: “weight added”) in order to be strong enough to withstand the forces associated with these vibrations.

    Virgin Galactic has considered injecting helium gas into the rocket engine in order to change and control the natural frequency of the engine, but that reduces the maximum altitude that they can achieve. I hope that in the three years since the accident that they have redesigned their engine so that it can perform as desired without the vibration problem.

  • Edward: Your points are well taken. However, it is my belief that some of Virgin Galactic’s problems come less from engineering and more from some management decisions early on that have hampered the spacecraft’s development. For one thing, it is my impression that their choice of the hybrid engine came not because of engineering considerations but because Richard Branson wanted to build a “green” spacecraft. If true, this decision was not based on picking the best engine system for the spacecraft, but Branson’s personal whim.

    Once they decided to begin building Virgin Orbit, the engineers could tell Branson to go jump in a lake. So could his backers, who needed to build this fast and well to recover some of their investment.

  • Edward

    … Richard Branson wanted to build a ‘green’ spacecraft. If true, this decision was not based on picking the best engine system for the spacecraft, but Branson’s personal whim.

    I recall some amount of pride Virgin Galactic had in their choice to change fuel types from what was used in SpaceShipOne. It reminds me of Congress setting design constraints on the SLS designers, similarly resulting in delays in reaching first launch.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *