Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

 
Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.

 

“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.

 

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.


June 5, 2018 Zimmerman/Batchelor podcast

Embedded below the fold in two parts.

Readers!
 

Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.


Your support is even more essential to me because I keep this site free from advertisements and do not participate in corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.


You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:
 


 

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

5 comments

  • Localfluff

    Same episode posted twice here. I heard the other one at John Batchelor.

    So they brag about “international cooperation” with the LOP-G. This is the danger with lousy space advocacy. It is unfortunately a standard argument that space flight improves international cooperation (since the Apollo-Soyuz docking). But that means that LOP-G is great even if it is nowhere doing nothing, because it delivers diplomacy! That’s the purpose of space flight, space advocates have argued, not space exploration.

    Another self destructive argument is spin off effects. Right. So if we get better kitchen utensils by going to the Moon, then maybe we get to the Moon by investing in feminist studies? Feminism as a way to the Moon, space advocates say. At least that’s what their audience hear.

    Diplomacy, space unrelated spin offs, high paying jobs. All threr right. What’s wrong with the LOP-G, politicians wonder after having listened to space advocates.

  • Localfluff: Thank you. The first podcast has been corrected.

  • Localfluff

    Reusing the fairing for F9 seems long winded with parachutes, cold gas thrusters, guidance system and two special ships. I wonder if the motive, rather than saving on the costs of the current fairing, is to develop much more advanced fairings. If it is reusable one can make it more expensive to provide better protection for the valuable payload, saving costs and time for the customers. Maybe a spacecraft suspended in the fairing could be isolated from vibrations.

  • Edward

    LOP-G is unnecessary for going back to the Moon, as Robert stated. Robert Zubrin — known for his advocacy of going to Mars in a direct and inexpensive way — has a suggestion for going directly to the Moon.
    http://spacenews.com/op-ed-moon-direct-how-to-build-a-moonbase-in-four-years/

    Zubrin mentions polar peaks that always receive light, “where sunlight is accessible all the time, as well as permanently shadowed craters nearby where water ice has accumulated.

    However, as J Fincannon mentioned in another post a week ago, these are hypothetical at best and likely only receive light 90% of the time. I read a similar analysis of these “areas of eternal light,” too, that they receive light most but not all of the time. This is still much better than 1/2 the time, and other than that, Zubrin’s case seems feasible — and it does not use a lunar space station as a way point.
    http://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/may-29-2018-zimmerman-batchelor-podcast/#comment-1053520

    Perhaps in the far distant future a way point lunar space station will be useful for refueling and allowing for a lighter lunar landing shuttle along with a larger low-Earth-orbit to lunar-orbit shuttle with sleeping quarters and other amenities for the longer voyage, but for the next couple of decades we are unlikely to use a lunar way station to get to or from the Moon.

  • Localfluff

    As always Zubrin goes for the most minimal doable mission to the Moon, which is great as a kind of reference for realistic missions. He wants to set up infrastructure so that astronauts can go to the Moon and back with a single F9 and Lunar refueling. But launching a second F9 would be easily motivated to improve everything.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *