Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.
Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:
If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
Cortaro, AZ 85652
Yesterday we took the train to London and settled into a really super modern hi-tech hotel dubbed “The Hub by Premier Inns.” It is also the crummiest hotel I have ever stayed at. I picked it because it was well recommended and was located less than a block from Trafalgar Square, shown on the right. And yes, it is new and fancy, with motion-controlled LED lights and fancy touch buttons and aps to control everything. It is also tiny, cramped, the controls are too limited and too difficult to decipher, even for a science journalist like myself. I suppose I shouldn’t complain, as it was reasonable in price considering the location. I still dislike the hi-tech nature of the room that only ended up limiting our convenience and comfort.
And the hotel didn’t even have an ice machine!
Today we wandered about the square, watching the street performers (buskers in British lingo) and admiring the statues and sights. Then we went into the National Gallery to enjoy some of humanity’s greatest art, as were a class of elementary school children as shown in the picture on the right.
The museum was packed with people from everywhere. I saw Japanese, Chinese, and Israeli tour groups. I saw people of all types clearly from London, including several school groups like the one to the right.
Interestingly, these crowds were all found in the permanent exhibits. One temporary exhibit we wandered through, art by an modern abstract artist by the name of Sean Scully, was practically empty.
Maybe this is a good sign. The picture on the right shows three of the many paintings by Scully in the exhibit. They are typical of all the paintings on display. While a close look at his technique and other works not on exhibit by him suggests he is a skilled and trained artist, the works on display were essentially intellectually bankrupt, as is most modern art. Thus, museum visitors walked through this exhibit quickly with little interest, mainly because the painting are simply not interesting. He might be experimenting with light and color, but after ten seconds the experiment becomes boring.
Sadly, this seems to the nature of too much modern art. When we took our first walk by the square last night we wandered into a gallery opening of another modern avant-garde artist whose work was as meaningless. That opening was packed with the snooty elitists of modern culture, advertising their individualism by nose-rings, tattoos, strange clothes and hairstyles (all of which are just variations of the the same thing so they all looked exactly alike). The only word I could think of was bankrupt.
The art that attracted the public however was truly a delight. We saw paintings covering almost five hundred years, from medieval religious art to 19th century Impressionism. The painting to the right was by Titian called the “The Vendramin Family” and painted around 1540. It shows the father and his brother “venerating the true cross” with the father’s seven sons gathered around. What attracted me was the youngest boy third from the right, holding the dog. Earlier religious paintings have the people looking at nothing in a contemplative manner. They also seem posed. Here Titian shows a real child, uninterested in the true cross as he eyes his brothers with a look that says, “Can I go now and play with my dog?” Very human.
I also liked the painting on the right by Jean-Etienne Liotard called “The Lavergne Family Breakfast.” Painted in 1754, it shows a mother and daughter eating breakfast with the little girl’s hair still in paper curlers. I had never heard of this artist before, but his work was quite impressive. I especially liked the naturalness of this painting, plus its clarity and luminescence.
Note also that though both are natural, they exude a sense of dignity. They come from a time where such behavior was always the goal, even though all recognized that as imperfect humans that goal was often unattainable.
Finally there was the Impressionists. To the right was Diane’s favorite painting of the day, Vincent van Gogh’s “Long Grass with Butterflies”, painted in 1890. We were both impressed at his ability to invoke grass so clearly, using single brushstrokes of green, white, and black. The man was an artistic genius, with a talent that transcends analysis.
Van Gogh of course was not the only impressionist art on display. We saw many masterpieces by Manet, Monet, Cezanne, Gauguin, Degas, Seurat, to name a few. Seeing these paintings live gives you a view you can’t get from television, movies, prints, or the internet.
Tonight we go to see “Man of La Mancha.” We were able to get nice seats for only 25 pounds each by buying the day of the performance.