NASA about to decide on its shuttle heavy-lift replacement


Readers!
 
Scroll down to read this post.
 
For many reasons, mostly political but partly ethical, I do not use Google, Facebook, Twitter. They practice corrupt business policies, while targeting conservative websites for censoring, facts repeatedly confirmed by news stories and by my sense that Facebook has taken action to prevent my readers from recommending Behind the Black to their friends.
 
Thus, I must have your direct support to keep this webpage alive. Not only does the money pay the bills, it gives me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.

 

Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.


 

Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

NASA is about to decide on its shuttle heavy-lift replacement, and it looks like it will be almost entirely shuttle-derived.

As I have said previously, this rocket will almost certainly never fly. NASA has to start over after spending billions and years developing Constellation, and is being given less money and time to do it.

And even if I am wrong and this rocket does fly, I bet it will do only one flight and then be retired as too costly.

Share

2 comments

  • Kelly Starks

    You forget, the SLS is just a rename of the Ares-V from the Constellation program. So work has alreasd been done on it.

    Realistically, SLS is a gap filler that seems to congress as likely building toward what will later be chosen, and a way to not throw out everything done on Constellation, and to not throw away all the US industrial infastructure related to maned space.

  • Kelly Starks

    Oh and as to ..”it will do only one flight and then be retired as too costly”.. all the costs rae upfrount costs (I.E. paid before the first flight) or standard keep KSc operating costs they want spent anyway. So flying further flights doesn’t really up the costs notably.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *