Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

 
Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.

 

“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.

 

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.


NASA approves Dream Chaser design

Capitalism in space? Sierra Nevada has, after several years of work, obtained NASA’s approval of the design of its Dream Chaser mini-shuttle, and will now begin construction.

I put a question mark in the header above because I am no longer sure Sierra Nevada is building a privately designed and privately owned spacecraft for the launch market. It seems that they have been captured entirely by NASA, and will instead be building the spacecraft NASA wants, which might raise costs enough to make this vehicle unaffordable for other customers.

The situation is understandable. Sierra Nevada does not have the independent capital that gives SpaceX its independence. It needs NASA to get this ship built, and thus will do whatever NASA demands. I just worry that NASA, unconcerned about cost (as is every agency in the federal government today), will spoil Dream Chaser’s viability in the commercial market.

Readers!
 

Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.


Your support is even more essential to me because I keep this site free from advertisements and do not participate in corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.


You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:
 


 

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

2 comments

  • Richard M

    Assuming this is getting priced upwards, there might still be a market for state actors, or scientific institutions heavily subsidized by state actors.

    Let us say a Dream Chaser Flight will cost a customer $120 million, launch vehicle included (I have no idea what SN plans to price it out at for non-NASA customers). The ESA or the UAE might not be able to afford the billions it would cost to build and operate their own crew vehicles, but might well find $120 million to put up a few of their astronauts and some experiments for several days something they could actually afford – and want to do. Especially if they don’t have to hassle with NASA.

    Of course, Dream Chaser is only a cargo vehicle at present, but it had all of its initial development as a crew vehicle, and may yet get a NASA contract for that in the next Commercial Crew contract round.

    Perhaps we will get a better idea of the market if and when SpaceX actually lands a non-NASA client for Dragon. They’re really pursuing BFR now, but I can’t think they won’t answer the phone if a serious offer for Dragon comes from a well-heeled client.

  • Edward

    Part of the beauty of Dream Chaser is that it provides a second vehicle that can return bulk cargo from space. I prefer the design for controlled landing on runways over the capsule under parachutes. It will be interesting to see how well Dream Chaser fares, after the disappointment of the Space Shuttle.

    Richard M wrote: “Perhaps we will get a better idea of the market if and when SpaceX actually lands a non-NASA client for Dragon.

    A non-NASA client for crewed Dragon (or cargo Dragon, for that matter) probably won’t happen until Bigelow or one of the other aspiring commercial space station companies gets something into space. This should happen in the next two or three years, beginning the creation of a much larger market for manned space.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *