New analysis throws wrench in formation theory of spirals in galaxies


Readers!
 
For many reasons, mostly political but partly ethical, I do not use Google, Facebook, Twitter. They practice corrupt business policies, while targeting conservative websites for censoring, facts repeatedly confirmed by news stories and by my sense that Facebook has taken action to prevent my readers from recommending Behind the Black to their friends.
 
Thus, I must have your direct support to keep this webpage alive. Not only does the money pay the bills, it gives me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.

 

Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.


 

Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

The uncertainty of science: A new analysis of over 6000 galaxies suggests that a long-held model for the formation of spirals in galaxies is wrong.

[Edwin] Hubble’s model soon became the authoritative method of classifying spiral galaxies, and is still used widely in astronomy textbooks to this day. His key observation was that galaxies with larger bulges tended to have more tightly wound spiral arms, lending vital support to the ‘density wave’ model of spiral arm formation.

Now though, in contradiction to Hubble’s model, the new work finds no significant correlation between the sizes of the galaxy bulges and how tightly wound the spirals are. This suggests that most spirals are not static density waves after all.

Essentially, we still have no idea why spirals form in galaxies.

Share

4 comments

  • Phill O

    Water, Earth, Fire and Air theory of matter dominated for quite awhile.

  • Terrence

    My theory is that two flat galaxies merge by spiraling in on each other. The galactic centers produce density waves that are the arms of the new galaxy.

  • pzatchok

    My idea is its in part related to the age of the galaxies.

    Not counting Galaxies that have interacted with other galaxies.

    The older the galaxy the longer it has had to compress, and like water going down a drain it starts to spin and then swirl creating “Arms” or waves.
    The number of arms is random or at least related to varying matter densities in the swirling galaxy.

    I look at theories like this are in the end trying to set rules to the seeming randomness of the universe, without knowing 99% of the factors.

  • wayne

    here, there, and everywhere…

    Sackler Lecture:
    “Galaxy Evolution in 3D”
    Lisa Kewley 2016
    https://youtu.be/Sxn_J5M1wzU
    54:46

    Joel Primack:
    “New Insights on Galaxy Formation from Comparing Simulations”
    Talks at Google 2017
    https://youtu.be/JFKZBuf1EZI
    1:00:01

    “An Electric Universe View of Stellar and Galactic Formation”
    Natural Philosophy Alliance 2012
    https://youtu.be/M2_H58oGHS0
    43:16

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *