Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

 
Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.

 

“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.

 

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.


New bipartisan budget deal cuts nothing from bloated federal government

The swamp wins! A bipartisan budget deal worked out by Republicans and Democrats in Congress will cut nothing from the bloated federal government.

While losing on the wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, Trump won a $15 billion down payment on his request to strengthen the military.

GOP leaders demurred from trying to use the must-do spending bill to “defund” Planned Parenthood. The White House also backed away from language to take away grants from “sanctuary cities” that do not share information about people’s immigration status with federal authorities.

The measure funds the remainder of the 2017 budget year, rejecting cuts to popular domestic programs targeted by Trump, such as medical research and infrastructure grants.

In other words, these corrupt bastards are doing nothing to reduce the budget, even though that is exactly what they were elected to do. Instead, they are growing it.

Readers!
 

I must unfortunately ask you for your financial support because I do not depend on ads and rely entirely on the generosity of readers to keep Behind the Black running. You can either make a one time donation for whatever amount you wish, or you sign up for a monthly subscription ranging from $2 to $15 through Paypal or $3 to $50 through Patreon.


Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.


Your support is even more essential to me because I not only keep this site free from advertisements, I do not use the corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook to promote my work. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.


You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:
 


 

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
 

Or you can donate by using Zelle through your bank. You will need to give my name and email address (found at the bottom of the "About" page). The best part of this electronic option is that no fees will be deducted! What you donate will be what I receive.

9 comments

  • wayne

    Best-Friends-of-Donald:
    Rence Priebus, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell.
    “We can’t do anything until you give us the House….
    We can’t do anything until you give us the Senate…
    We can’t do anything until you give us the Presidency….
    Sorry, we can’t stop ourselves from lying, next stop… $21 Trillion in Debt.”

    Living Colour
    Cult Of Personality
    https://youtu.be/7xxgRUyzgs0
    (4:52)

  • wayne

    “Autopilot Spending Devours Budget”
    Heritage Foundation; Federal Budget in Pictures.
    http://federalbudgetinpictures.com/autopilot-spending-devours-budget/

  • PeterF

    So it appears that “the Donald” has been rolled. I wonder if it bothers him the “Chuckles the Clown” Shumer is laughing at him. All I can hope for at this point is that the president remembers that he has the power of VETO. That would sure wipe the smile off the RINOs faces!

  • Gealon

    Time to get out the pen and telephone.

  • wayne

    (Donald Loves Chucky, he certainly gave enough money to him over the decades.)

    Mark Levin:
    “Liberal Republicans owe Obama an apology for trash-talking Obamacare…”
    (April 28 2017)
    https://youtu.be/1vGi7eZ7ptk
    (9:35)

    Mitch, Ryan, McCarthy, and Scaliese, “the Usual Statist Big Government RINO suspects,” and they are IN CHARGE of the whole Government.
    (and we can’t forget Willll-bur over at The Agriculture Department, he never met an agriculture-subsidy or protective-tariff, he didn’t LOVE.)

  • wayne

    Food Stamp Spending
    (SNAP)
    http://federalbudgetinpictures.com/food-stamps-spending/

    –47 million recipients, at a cost of $78 billion a year.

  • Commodude

    Every time we have a national election, people get wrapped around the axle about the Presidential race and ignore the poltroons in Congress.

    To effect ANY change you need at least half of the 535 seats to change from the incumbents to new reps, and that’s not happening. Barring retirements, there’s over a 90% incumbent reelection rate.

    We have royalty, we’ve just changed the manner in which they get their titles. Once elected, it’s almost impossible to unseat an incumbent.

  • Michael

    If the republicans do not get with the program the next election in 2018 with have one of two outcomes:

    The democrats will re-take the house and senate in which the country will be lost (most likely)

    or

    the republicans will retake the house and senate with a blood bath occurring among the leadership and the lower ranks that will be staggering (desirable but not likely)

  • Mitch S.

    Let’s remember that a politician’s #1 priority is to get reelected.
    Now we all want our Pols to promise to cut spending and reduce the deficit – but when it comes to actually doing something are we willing to take the pain?

    We’ve been spending beyond our means for decades and there is no way to truly reduce the deficit/debt without cutting things that are backed by various constituencies.
    So a Congressman has a choice – face the people and tell them their taxes can’t go down and there will be cuts in benefits or just pretend program and benefits can continue because we’ll solve the deficit by:
    A) Dems: taxing the rich and corporations – of course it never really happens because the pols need the money from the rich/corps.
    or
    b) Repubs: We’ll cut entitlements and taxes – and the lower taxes will cause a boom that fills the treasury. – Of course the cuts never happen because the pols don’t want to piss off voters and the tax cuts end up being funneled to donors.

    And many of us here would correctly point out that even if taxes are truly raised, the gov’t will just grow to absorb the additional revenues.

    Most politicians simply go with A or B even though they know it doesn’t work – why give an opponent ammunition to use to defeat you?

    Will the “deficit hawk” who wants to soak the rich or cut the Pentagon be willing to do without funding for Sesame Street” or free cell phones?
    Will the “deficit hawk” who wants to cut entitlements and waste be happy when his Medicare payments go up, a carrier group is eliminated, the main employer in town that makes parts for fancy weapon systems that don’t work (or rockets that are never launched) is closed?

    Let’s remember every frivolous budget item has an interest group who will point out why their slice of pork is vital to the nation and cutting it would be unfair and an outrage when there is so much other waste.
    (I’m sure every military golf course and General’s Gulfstream has a paper explaining how necessary it is)

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *