Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

 
Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.

 

“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.

 

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.


Obama makes another empty space commitment

In an op-ed today, President Barack Obama made another one of those Presidential Kennedy-like space commitments, this time proposing that the U.S. send humans to Mars.

We have set a clear goal vital to the next chapter of America’s story in space: sending humans to Mars by the 2030s and returning them safely to Earth, with the ultimate ambition to one day remain there for an extended time. Getting to Mars will require continued cooperation between government and private innovators, and we’re already well on our way. Within the next two years, private companies will for the first time send astronauts to the International Space Station.

Obama in his op-ed spends a lot of time claiming credit for the recent resurgence in the American space industry. Though his administration does deserve some of the credit, in that they continued and expanded the commercial space initiative first started in the Bush administration, the bulk of the credit here really must be given to the private companies that did the actual work. SpaceX and Orbital ATK took enormous financial risks to make their rockets and capsules fly. They made it happen, proving at last to a generation that had lost faith in private enterprise and freedom that relying on private enterprise and freedom really is the best way to do things.

Meanwhile, I would not take Obama’s proposal very seriously. We will have a new president in just a matter of a few months, and that president will make his or her own decisions. Moreover, it really won’t matter that much what that next president proposes anyway. The real story will be with private individuals and private companies, forging their own dreams as they search for ways to get into space in a profitable manner.

Readers!
 

I must unfortunately ask you for your financial support because I do not depend on ads and rely entirely on the generosity of readers to keep Behind the Black running. You can either make a one time donation for whatever amount you wish, or you sign up for a monthly subscription ranging from $2 to $15 through Paypal or $3 to $50 through Patreon.


Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.


Your support is even more essential to me because I not only keep this site free from advertisements, I do not use the corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook to promote my work. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.


You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:
 


 

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
 

Or you can donate by using Zelle through your bank. You will need to give my name and email address (found at the bottom of the "About" page). The best part of this electronic option is that no fees will be deducted! What you donate will be what I receive.

5 comments

  • Matt in AZ

    He claimed that last year , NASA discovered “evidence of ice on one of Jupiter’s moons”. This alone shows he doesn’t know what he’s talking about, or care enough to get it right. Total fluff.

  • Frank

    The government’s access to nearly unlimited national resources uniquely enables high risk first-time projects, particularly when there is a strong voter consensus and a clear goal (like the space race with the Soviets to the moon). When any of these endeavors, become routine the government model does not work well because the focus shifts from work with clear goals shared and understood by everyone to providing a repeatable service which requires good managers, little bureaucracy and accountability.

    Government provided service is expensive at best and more likely to be inefficient and ineffective. Sometimes its deadly. Think Obamacare, Department of Motor Vehicles, VA, etc. And today, with the polarized political climate, any government led project taking more than one presidential term or a few budget turns is at risk of being killed or subject to mission creep.

    NASA’s loss of vision after the moon landings was apparent. Those of us into it could feel it. The Apollo-Soyuz project was political mission and the Shuttle was a glorious but expensive machine that enabled expensive endeavors (no pun intended). To be fair, hindsight is 20/20 and we still had much to learn but now its time to apply what we have learned.

    I’d like to see our government’s role in space shift to an enabler of a highly competitive private space industry with seed money (if needed) and as a provider infrastructure that can be shared by all competitors.

  • wodun

    You can tell Obama isn’t serious because he didn’t pull out of the OST and didn’t direct NASA to focus planetary science missions on prospecting Mars for colonization and resource extraction.

    The environmentalists are going to go ape when actual work to colonize Mars starts and that includes many people in the sciences.

  • Edward

    From the Obama’s OpEd: “We have set a clear goal vital to the next chapter of America’s story in space: sending humans to Mars by the 2030s and returning them safely to Earth, with the ultimate ambition to one day remain there for an extended time.

    Isn’t this the same nebulous, unfunded non-goal that was set a few years back, when the deadline was 2030 rather than sometime in the 2030s, and was taken so seriously that the end-date keeps changing and no funding, strategizing, or planning has yet materialized to make it come true (explaining the slip in end-date)?

    But then, when Obama first announced that we were going to Mars, it was not nearly as memorable a moment as Kennedy’s speech talking about going to the moon.

    When President Kennedy spoke at Rice University, on that hot September day in 1962, he spoke inspirational words, explaining the difficulties to overcome, and expressing his confidence that it could and would happen.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntb4eSAktnE

    This Obama clown gives the boring announcement, “I’m excited to announce that we are working with our commercial partners to build new habitats that can sustain and transport astronauts on long-duration missions in deep space.”

    An announcement so unexciting that he forgot to tell us about these exciting new habitats or who the commercial partners are. He failed to explain anything about why are these new habitats are any better than our very expensive ISS, which was supposed to do exactly what he says these new habitats are going to do.

    Obama makes it sound like we are taking a routine trip, such as going to the corner grocery for a couple of eggs, except that we have partners for the journey. Kennedy’s words were motivational, demanding that we be bold, that we go not because it is easy but because it is hard. Obama’s words are mundane.

    I believe that when man goes to Mars, it will be the commercial “partners” who go, while the government remains behind arguing over the correct way to go.

  • Localfluff

    It’s at least a good thing that Clinton most likely will continue Obama’s pro private space policy. And Trump has mentioned and lauded it. Johnson would surely cut back on NASA overall, to the degree he really is a libertarians. Stein would maybe transform it to environmental and climate Earth observations only.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *