Pluto formed from a billion comets?


Pioneer cover

From the press release: From the moment he is handed a possibility of making the first alien contact, Saunders Maxwell decides he will do it, even if doing so takes him through hell and back.

 
Unfortunately, that is exactly where that journey takes him.

 
The vision that Zimmerman paints of vibrant human colonies on the Moon, Mars, the asteroids, and beyond, indomitably fighting the harsh lifeless environment of space to build new societies, captures perfectly the emerging space race we see today.


He also captures in Pioneer the heart of the human spirit, willing to push forward no matter the odds, no matter the cost. It is that spirit that will make the exploration of the heavens possible, forever, into the never-ending future.

 
Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at amazon, Barnes & Noble, all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit.
 

Scientists have come up with a new theory for the origin of Pluto, based on data from New Horizons and Rosetta, that suggests the planets formed from the accretion of a billion comets or Kuiper Belt objects.

“We’ve developed what we call ‘the giant comet’ cosmochemical model of Pluto formation,” said Dr. Christopher Glein of SwRI’s Space Science and Engineering Division. The research is described in a paper published online today in Icarus. At the heart of the research is the nitrogen-rich ice in Sputnik Planitia, a large glacier that forms the left lobe of the bright Tombaugh Regio feature on Pluto’s surface. “We found an intriguing consistency between the estimated amount of nitrogen inside the glacier and the amount that would be expected if Pluto was formed by the agglomeration of roughly a billion comets or other Kuiper Belt objects similar in chemical composition to 67P, the comet explored by Rosetta.”

This is only a hypothesis, but it is intriguing. It suggests that Pluto’s make-up came only from the outer parts of the solar system, thus constraining how much mixing between the solar system’s inner and outer regions occurred. For scientists trying to understand the formation of the entire solar system, this lack of mixing would be significant. It means that the gas giants, while migrating inward, never migrated outward.

Share
Readers!
 

Every July, to celebrate the anniversary of the start of Behind the Black in 2010, I hold a month-long fund-raising campaign to make it possible for me to continue my work here for another year.
 

This year's fund-raising drive however is more significant in that it is also the 10th anniversary of this website's founding. It is hard to believe, but I have been doing this for a full decade, during which I have written more than 22,000 posts, of which more than 1,000 were essays and almost 2,600 were evening pauses.
 

This year's fund drive is also more important because of the growing intolerance of free speech and dissent in American culture. Increasingly people who don't like what they read are blatantly acting to blackball sites like mine. I have tried to insulate myself from this tyrannical effort by not depending on Google advertising or cross-posts Facebook or Twitter. Though this prevents them from having a hold on me, it also acts to limit my exposure.
 

Therefore, I hope you will please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.


 

Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

5 comments

  • Klystron

    Would this not also throw gas back on the fire whether Pluto is a planet or not, with its origins being that of KBO’s? The more we know, the more we know we don’t know!!

  • If this theory is correct then wouldn’t the density of comets in the Oort belt be about the same as asteroids are in the asteroid belt?

  • Localfluff

    @Doug,
    The Kuiper Belt is much less dense than the Asteroid Belt. The average distance between Kuiper Belt objects has been estimated to be the same as the distance between objects in the inner Solar System! Mercury, Venus, Earth, Moon, Mars, Deimos, Phobos. If we add the few largest NEA to that, the inner Solar System is a bit denser.

    Since Pluto is in orbital resonance with Neptune, it is natural to assume that Neptune’s migration could have had something to do with the formation or evolution of Pluto. But it has been a long time and many things can have happened.

  • BSJ

    After the fly-by, they announced that Pluto had a weak comet like tail.

    I thought to myself that that would mean Pluto is really nothing more than a giant comet. I guess I’m not the only one to think so…

  • Localfluff

    @BSJ, Pluto is a comet for sure. Of it came close to the Sun it would form a huge tail. The upper size limit for a comet is somewhere between the mass of Earth and Neptune. Too large and they get a hydrogen envelope. If a big comet hit Earth the right way, it could stop our rotation, resurface the planet and bring a thick CO2 atmosphere. Maybe that’ what happened to an Earth like living Venus 0.3 billion years ago? Planetary scientists however prefer the idea of internal episodic volcanism, about which very little is known. It is indeed very unlikely that a huge comet hits a terrestrial planet.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *