Recent results from the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope have found no evidence of dark matter, a result in some conflict with data obtained from several underground research detectors.


A quick holiday fund-raising campaign for Behind the Black!
 
Scroll down to read this post.
 
In past years I have managed to avoid asking for donations for Behind the Black during the holiday season. My finances however now compel me to do a short one-week fund-raiser, from November 11 to November 17.
 
I do not use Twitter for ethical reasons, which I have been told cuts down on traffic to the website. So be it. Furthermore, Facebook has clearly acted in the past two years to limit traffic to Behind the Black, almost certainly for political reasons. So be this as well. Finally, I do not post outside ads, as I have found them annoying to my readers and not that profitable to me.

 

Therefore, I need to ask for the direct support from my readers. If you like what I do here, please consider contributing, either by making a one-time donation or a monthly subscription, as indicated in the tip jar below.


 

Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

Or you could consider purchasing one of my books, as indicated in the boxes scattered throughout the website. My histories of space exploration are award-winning and are aimed for the general public. All are page-turners, and all not only tell the story of the beginning of the human exploration of space, they also help explain why we are where we are today. And I also have a science fiction book available, Pioneer, which tells its own exciting story while trying to predict what life in space will be like two hundred years in the future.

 

Note that for this week only I am also having a sale on the purchase of the last 20 hardbacks of Leaving Earth. (Click on the link for more information about the book, which was endorsed by Arthur C. Clarke himself!) This award-winning out-of-print book is now only available as an ebook, but I still have a handful of hardbacks available, normally for sale for $70 plus $5 shipping. For this week only you can buy them, personally autographed by me, for $50 plus $5 shipping! Just send me a check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to the address above, with a note saying that the money is for the Leaving Earth hardback.

 

Please consider donating. Your help will make it possible for me to continue to be an independent reporter in the field of space, science, technology, and culture.

The uncertainty of science: Recent results from the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope have found no evidence of dark matter, a result in some conflict with data obtained from several underground research detectors.

The mystery here is that there is no doubt that something causes the outer objects in galaxies to move faster than expected. Scientists have labeled this something as dark matter, guessing that some undetected and unknown mass exists in the outer reaches of galaxies, thereby increasing the gravity potential and hence the velocity in which objects move.

The problem is that they have yet to identify what that dark matter is.

Share

4 comments

  • jwing

    I propose a funding and grant system that rewards true scientific questioning and not vested interest in a scientist’s expertise and “belief in” dark matter. I am sure there are many dark matter proponents that are scrambeling to right grants that contiune funding their reseach into dark matter regardless of the emperical scientific data. It is sad that I used the word “proponents” instead of objective, unbiased, self-sacrificing scientists, but it is undeniable, science today is completely political and in order to advance in the academic research field one must be equal parts advocate, fund raiser and then scientist.
    I then propose a grant and fund awarding system that awards fair-minded, well intentioned scientists greater funding for DISPROVING the highly questionable reaseach and papers. Put the ability for a scientist to disprove a theory on at least equal funding levels as those doing advacocy science i.e. junk science. The rational is clear, this new funding mechanism will save billions of dollars and precious time going down what amount to proverbial rabbit holes.It will advance the known scientific truth.
    QED

  • jwing

    Mea culpa, I should have written “proverbial wormhole” as it is far more apropos.

  • Please, not another government “system” for solving our problems.

    On the subject of dark matter, the science is actually proceeding in a very healthy manner, unlike climate science. There are many different experiments trying to answer the question. Some are getting results. Others are contradicting those results. No one is trying to shut down any research because it disagrees with theory.

  • jwing

    I agree with your point. I don’t want any more government intervention, either. I suggest tweaking the current corrupt grant/funding process to balance out the research. While a new scientific theory is being explored and funded, it should not be “top-loaded” from the start to basically shut out any other metholodgical differing approach, other than the politically correct, pop-culture driven, celebrity endorsed and U.N. blessed theory.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *