“Self-confessed liar publishes more dubious stem-cell work.”


Readers!
 
For many reasons, mostly political but partly ethical, I do not use Google, Facebook, Twitter. They practice corrupt business policies, while targeting conservative websites for censoring, facts repeatedly confirmed by news stories and by my sense that Facebook has taken action to prevent my readers from recommending Behind the Black to their friends.
 
Thus, I must have your direct support to keep this webpage alive. Not only does the money pay the bills, it gives me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.

 

Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.


 

Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

The sad state of science: “Self-confessed liar publishes more dubious stem-cell work.”

That’s an actual Nature headline. Worse, the publication that published the new papers — which were plagiarized from already retracted papers — is peer-reviewed, which illustrates how seriously they take that review process — not!

Share

One comment

  • D. K. Williams

    An indictment of “peers” as much as the author. Science by its very nature involves skepticism, it’s sad one must also be skeptical of “scientists.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *