“Self-confessed liar publishes more dubious stem-cell work.”

Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar to the right or below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

The sad state of science: “Self-confessed liar publishes more dubious stem-cell work.”

That’s an actual Nature headline. Worse, the publication that published the new papers — which were plagiarized from already retracted papers — is peer-reviewed, which illustrates how seriously they take that review process — not!


One comment

  • D. K. Williams

    An indictment of “peers” as much as the author. Science by its very nature involves skepticism, it’s sad one must also be skeptical of “scientists.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *