Pioneer cover

From the press release: From the moment he is handed a possibility of making the first alien contact, Saunders Maxwell decides he will do it, even if doing so takes him through hell and back.

Unfortunately, that is exactly where that journey takes him.

The vision that Zimmerman paints of vibrant human colonies on the Moon, Mars, the asteroids, and beyond, indomitably fighting the harsh lifeless environment of space to build new societies, captures perfectly the emerging space race we see today.

He also captures in Pioneer the heart of the human spirit, willing to push forward no matter the odds, no matter the cost. It is that spirit that will make the exploration of the heavens possible, forever, into the never-ending future.

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at amazon, Barnes & Noble, all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit.

Senate fails to fully fund manned lander for Trump’s 2024 lunar mission

The Senate appropriations committee’s budget recommendations for NASA, released yesterday, has refused to fully fund the development of the manned lander needed for Trump’s 2024 lunar mission.

The Senate Appropriations Committee released its recommendations for all 12 FY2021 appropriations bills today. The Commerce-Justice-Science (CJS) bill provides NASA with $23.5 billion, $1.75 billion less than requested. The House-passed bill keeps the agency at its current level of $22.6 billion, so the final compromise likely will be somewhere in that range. NASA’s request for Human Landing Systems (HLS) for the Artemis program was particularly hard hit on both sides of Capitol Hill.

NASA had requested $3.4 billion for building the lunar lander in time for 2024. The House appropriated $628 million. Today’s Senate recommendation budgeted $1 billion. This practically guarantees that no manned lunar mission will happen by 2024.

None of this is a surprise. The politicians in Congress from both parties don’t really want to rush this program. For them it is better to stretch it out for as long as possible, spending mucho bucks in their states and districts. Nothing will be accomplished, but they will be able to tell their constituents they brought the jobs home.

Useless and empty jobs, but jobs nonetheless.

Readers! My Quick November Fund-Raiser for Behind the Black is now over

I cannot thank the numerous people who so generously donated or subscribed to Behind the Black during this fund drive. The response was remarkable, and reflected the steady growth and popularity of the work I have been doing here for the past ten-plus years.

Thank you again!

Though the find-raising campaign is officially over, and I am no longer plastering the main page with requests for help, if you like what you have read you can still contribute, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


  • sippin_bourbon

    This is bad. If they do not push the schedule, then it opens the door to infinite delays, and eventual cancellation.

    My own cynical prediction: President Harris cancels the program.

  • NavyNuke

    I see in their infinite wisdom, the committee managed to approved $0.3 billion for an SLS-upper-stage-to-nowhere.

  • Doubting THomas

    If Elon is successful with Starship development, perhaps it lowers the cost enough for a “The Man Who Sold the Moon” scenario. Perhaps Elon is Delos Harriman or someone else plays that role using Starship or a variant.

  • Edward

    If SpaceX gets to the Moon with Starship before NASA gets there on SLS, I wonder whether SpaceX will wait for NASA to put the first woman on the Moon or if they will do so themselves.

  • janyuary

    Edward, I once spoke with a woman who had begun her career as a quite successful and respected architect at a time when women architects were few. I was instructed to ask her about any women’s architect groups she supported and her thoughts on mentoring more women into the profession. Her polite reply after a period of thoughtful silence: “I have never been part of any women’s architect organizations, though I do belong to the major architectural associations. I have never seen what being a woman has to do with it. There is only one thing that’s important, and that is: are you a professional?”

  • Would SpaceX move more quickly in developing their Starship if they were to get more NASA funding? It appears as though they are moving as quickly as possible now.

    Would Blue Origin move less slowly if they were to get additional NASA funding? $1 B/yr of Bezos’ sold stock is quite a bit. Would $1 B + $1 B significantly speed them up?

    Dynetics in the other hand could really use the money and doesn’t have as much moola to spend sans NASA funding.

  • Edward

    DougSpace asked (rhetorically?): “Would $1 B + $1 B significantly speed them up?

    I suspect that if it could speed them up then Bezos would spend that much more on Blue Origin. Blue Origin is probably working as fast as it can, which is slower than SpaceX because of their very different corporate cultures.

    I’m going to take your story as meaning that you don’t think SpaceX will wait for NASA but will put together the best crews for their lunar missions.

  • eddie willers

    “I have never been part of any women’s architect organizations, though I do belong to the major architectural associations. I have never seen what being a woman has to do with it. There is only one thing that’s important, and that is: are you a professional?”

    A perfect answer. One that the very good Netflix series, “The Queen’s Gambit” gets into as well.

    Larry Elder tells a story of two golf pros asked “how do you determine a good golfer?”

    The first talks about a good stance, the proper backswing, hand placement, a good follow through etc.

    The second says, “I look to see where the ball lands”.

    I am so sick and tired of gender/race etc. instead of results that I could just scream.

    You either get the ball where it needs to go or you don’t.

  • Edward_2

    My guess is that China will be putting humans on the Moon, next.

    Alternatively Private (Musk/Bezos) will beat NASA and China to land humans on the Moon.

    Musk will put a Tesla rover on the Moon.

  • janyuary

    Edward, I’m puzzled: “I’m going to take your story as meaning that you don’t think SpaceX will wait for NASA but will put together the best crews for their lunar missions.”

    From my POV, putting together the best crew precludes considering a crew member’s sex as significant in such a mission.

    eddie: excellent, isn’t elder wonderful

  • Edward

    I am confused by your puzzlement. My sentence and your point of view are equivalent.

  • Jeff Wright

    The upper stage will be for outer solar probes to be orbiters instead of fly-by missions.

    That is where SLS will shine, once bugs are worked out

Readers: the rules for commenting!


No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.


However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.


Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *