Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

 
Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.

 

“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.

 

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.


Sierra Nevada has successfully completed wind tunnel tests a several scale models of their winged spacecraft Dream Chaser.

The competition heats up: Sierra Nevada has successfully completed wind tunnel tests a several scale models of their winged spacecraft Dream Chaser.

It appears from these tests that the spacecraft’s design works better than expected during ascent and re-entry.

The article also gives a quick overview of the status of all three commercial companies, and from this it really looks to me as if Boeing is the least aggressive in pursuing its construction effort. This is merely an impression, and not to be taken too seriously, but it really does look like Boeing is playing the public relations game, doing as little work as possible while trying to garner the most publicity while waiting for the award of the contract.

Readers!
 

I must unfortunately ask you for your financial support because I do not depend on ads and rely entirely on the generosity of readers to keep Behind the Black running. You can either make a one time donation for whatever amount you wish, or you sign up for a monthly subscription ranging from $2 to $15 through Paypal or $3 to $50 through Patreon.


Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.


Your support is even more essential to me because I not only keep this site free from advertisements, I do not use the corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook to promote my work. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.


You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:
 


 

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
 

Or you can donate by using Zelle through your bank. You will need to give my name and email address (found at the bottom of the "About" page). The best part of this electronic option is that no fees will be deducted! What you donate will be what I receive.

3 comments

  • Kelly Starks

    The opinion around here is that they have done a conservative NASA friendly design, in as NASA friendly (cut no corners) highests quality manor. And they are the most expensive which is a big plus for voter/congressional support.

    Dream Chasers a lot cheaper, and still built by reputable teams and high quality, but not as high so it costs significantly less. But the softer landing, more operationally flexible then the other two is a plus.

    SpaceX is the wild child spending ridiculously little, no experienced folk in the teams, no standard aerospace practices etc, and still kinda pricy; but huge political connections.

    Its a guess for everyone which way it will go.

  • Dick Eagleson

    The only voters who support the most expensive option are the ones employed in producing it. The rest of us wish you’d all go get real jobs.

    Also to be noted, the false conflation of cost and quality.

    I think you’ll find SpaceX has quite a few “experienced folk in the teams” including a few NASA veterans so ancient they actually worked there when the agency knew how to design and build stuff. That would exclude most anyone who has come aboard NASA in the last, say, three decades. Not surprising to me at all if SpaceX round-filed their resumes.

    Note: “no standard aerospace practices” = no bribing Congressmen to get cost-plus contracts with no hard performance requirements.

    :Huge political connections?” Surely you jest. I once called the local office of the Congresswoman who represents the district in which SpaceX’s Hawthorne, CA plant is located. The person who took my call seemed never to have heard of SpaceX despite it being one of the largest employers in the district.

  • Kelly Starks

    >..The only voters who support the most expensive option are the ones employed in producing it. ..

    Very very untrue. The vast bulk of public support for NASA has long been shown to be due to it spending money in the voters districts. Something like 90% of the folks who’d actually write to a congressman etc, are for the pork. No surprise why gov programs maximize pork. Its just worse for NASA, since unlike the mil or the huge welfare programs, their actual products gen very little interest.

    > … The rest of us wish you’d all go get real jobs…

    Don’t look at me dude, at the moment I’m doing Dream Chaser.
    ;)

    > Also to be noted, the false conflation of cost and quality.

    Yeah, lets just say when you say you can do things for 100 times cheaper then NASA and dozens of times cheaper then any commercials, people can pretty well expect their going to get a Trabant not a Caddy.

    >
    > I think you’ll find SpaceX has quite a few “experienced folk in the teams” including a few NASA veterans
    > so ancient they actually worked there when the agency knew how to design and build stuff.===

    Actually NASA never designed and built stuff, they ordered it from companies who did. Back in Von Brauns day they did excel at systems engineering, requirements analysis, traceability — all the plus side of paperwork [the major now “standard aerospace practices” that are why the – which are things engineering folks I know who toured SpaceX noted was seriously missing.

    Actually the low % of senior folks and expertice was long noted as a issue with SpaceX, as well as a high turn over rate of the prime folks. But as to teams.. compare that with SNC Dream Chaser Team

    Boeing Phantom Works – construction of some early[which?] test articles[12][dated info]
    Charles Stark Draper Laboratory – Guidance, Navigation and Control[12]
    Aerojet – reaction control system technology[12]
    University of Colorado – human-rating[12]
    AdamWorks – composites[12]
    MDA – systems engineering[12]
    Lockheed Martin – airframe construction and human rating of the spaceplane[44][45]

    And of course smaller groups like the Orbitek team I’m working on doing ECLSS, TCS, and possibly soon propulsion systems.

    >…Huge political connections?” Surely you jest. ..

    If you’ld noted here and other places. Musk has been very good about pouring money into the best hands.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.