Sloppy biosafety procedures found at federal disease center


Readers!
 
Scroll down to read this post.
 
For many reasons, mostly political but partly ethical, I do not use Google, Facebook, Twitter. They practice corrupt business policies, while targeting conservative websites for censoring, facts repeatedly confirmed by news stories and by my sense that Facebook has taken action to prevent my readers from recommending Behind the Black to their friends.
 
Thus, I must have your direct support to keep this webpage alive. Not only does the money pay the bills, it gives me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.

 

Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.


 

Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

Does this make you feel safer? An investigation of a federal center for studying dangerous diseases in primates has found serious biosafety procedure violations.

Concerns arose at the center in Covington, Louisiana, after two rhesus macaques became ill in late November with melioidosis, a disease caused by the tropical bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei. In January, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Department of Agriculture investigators traced the strain infecting the primates to a vaccine research lab working with mice. Last month, as the investigation continued, CDC suspended the primate center’s 10 or so research projects involving B. pseudomallei and other select agents (a list of dangerous bacteria, viruses, and toxins that are tightly regulated). Meanwhile, a report in USA Today suggested the bacterium might have contaminated the center’s soil or water.

…In addition, workers “frequently entered the select agent lab without appropriate protective clothing,” the release says. No center staff has shown signs of illness. On 12 March, however, Tulane announced that blood tests have found that one worker has low levels of antibodies to the bacterium, suggesting possible exposure at the center, according to ABC News.

Is there any area of government expertise that isn’t screwing up royally these days? As far as I can tell, the answer is no. The sooner we as a people can cut back on the government’s resources so that they won’t have the ability to do us harm, the better off we will be.

Share

One comment

  • Edward

    > Is there any area of government expertise that isn’t screwing up royally these days? As far as I can tell, the answer is no.

    I think that the expertise of our military forces are still able to defeat our enemies, but they are being inexpertly utilized.

    Our police forces also have developed very effective and protective expertise in a variety of areas, but they are continually being disrespected by those who use the tern “racist” to describe effective tactics and strategies*.

    Other emergency responders also have demonstrated superior expertise, but they are the unsung heroes in our society. We do not hear of their heroics often enough, so all too often we forget about them.

    On the other hand, it seems that some people in safety or health related fields are not made aware enough of the consequences of bad behavior (e.g. not wearing adequate protective clothing). Another example is the VA intentionally lying to us about wait times. It looks like government can be very inexpert in its (mis)management. Without a competitor, government has no incentive to improve.

    * Professor Gates was a “victim” of a procedure that is employed no matter the race of the homeowner, but Gates chose to declare such procedures as racist — but only because he was overly sensitive and because history showed him that he could get away with such a charge. With Obama’s support, he almost got away with it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *