SpaceX preps for next launch

Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar to the right or below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

SpaceX has begun placing the ten Iridium satellites inside their Falcon 9 housing in preparation for its next launch, now planned for no earlier than January 7.

The first 10 satellites for Iridium’s next-generation mobile voice and data relay network have been fueled, joined with their deployment module and encapsulated inside the clamshell-like nose cone of a SpaceX Falcon 9 booster for launch as soon as next week from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. SpaceX and Iridium have not announced a target launch date, but engineers are aiming to have the mission ready for liftoff by Jan. 7. That schedule is still very preliminary.

An official target launch date is pending the Federal Aviation Administration’s approval of the SpaceX-led investigation into the explosion of a Falcon 9 rocket on a launch pad at Cape Canaveral on Sept. 1, which destroyed the Israeli-owned Amos 6 communications satellite awaiting liftoff a few days later.

The article also has this interesting tidbit:

After the Falcon 9 rocket completes its pre-flight “static fire” test on the launch pad — the same test that resulted in the explosion in Florida on Sept. 1 — the 10 Iridium Next satellites will be mated with the booster for liftoff.

This suggests that SpaceX is changing its launch procedures, whereby before it would do the static fire dress rehearsal with the payload already loaded on the rocket. For this launch at least they are going to do that dress rehearsal before installing the payload on the rocket.



  • LocalFluff

    “they are going to do that dress rehearsal before installing the payload on the rocket”
    Sounds like a good idea, Not to say obvious. “Testing” with the payload aboard is like testing if a glass vase will make a drop from the tenth floor, by actually dropping it from the tenth floor. Sure, it makes for a more realistic test, but the whole benefit of testing is lost. Or lighting a match and putting it back in the box for later use saying: “Oh, this one works, it’s a keeper!” I’m surprised they came up with that idea to begin with, but SPX is a learning organization so it is surely getting better.

  • Mike Borgelt

    IIRC it was always up to the customer whether or not the static fire was done with the payload attached.
    There are pros and cons for both ways.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *