Scroll down to read this post.


Please consider supporting my work here at Behind The Black by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, in any one of the following ways:


1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.


2. Donate through Gabpay, using my email address zimmerman @ nasw dot org.

3. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.

4. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:

5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

SpaceX ramps up Raptor engine tests

Capitalism in space: SpaceX has conducted another Raptor engine test, this time running the engine at full power.

“Raptor just achieved power level needed for Starship [and] Super Heavy,” Musk tweeted just after 3 a.m. EST (08:00 GMT) Feb. 7.

Musk did not say how long the test was or if it was at full power. The Feb. 3 burn was only about two seconds and at about 60 percent power. However, he said the latter test reached a chamber pressure of 257 bar, or about 3,700 pounds per square inch, and an estimated force of about 172 metric tons with “warm propellant.”

Musk has said that they will be doing hopper test flights with their Starship prototype this spring, but they can’t do that until they have three working Raptor engines. It seems to me that it will be at least a few months before this engine is tested sufficiently to be ready for flight. Then they need two more finished engines.

Don’t expect the first Starship hopper flights for at least six more months, if that soon.

Conscious Choice cover

Now available in hardback and paperback as well as ebook!


From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.


“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.


All editions are available at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all book vendors, with the ebook priced at $5.99 before discount. The ebook can also be purchased direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit, in which case you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.


Autographed printed copies are also available at discount directly from me (hardback $24.95; paperback $14.95; Shipping cost for either: $5.00). Just email me at zimmerman @ nasw dot org.


  • Diane Wilson

    Word on NSF yesterday centered around 90% power for less than 10 seconds, probably around 6. Also, shock and awe that this test followed the first by only two days. Musk says it will be a while (Musk time?) for full power. But this is sufficient for the hopper and apparently the first prototypes.

    No speculation yet on “full duration” firing, whatever that might mean for hopper engines. And no word on the overall test plan, but noting that this is a full-scale Raptor fresh off the production line. (I don’t think I’d call serial number one a “production model,” though. Close.) Depending on results, this engine may get more testing than hopper engines two and three, and maybe a spare for the hopper. I don’t expect a test-to-destruction until after the hopper has its engines. The hopper engines will get some restart testing, but again I expect that engines for prototypes will get a lot more of that.

    By way of comparison, Boeing sets aside two airframes for static testing of new airliners, one for wing deflection (usually to destruction, although they didn’t do that for the composite wings of the 787), and one for fatigue testing, with simulated take-off and landing cycles in excess of expected airframe life. That seems a prudent approach for high reliability and reuse.

  • Edward

    Diane Wilson wrote: “I don’t expect a test-to-destruction until after the hopper has its engines.

    I don’t expect any intentional tests to destruction on rocket engines. It tends to be hard on the test equipment, and it does not reassure customers. (9 minutes: “Test firing a new rocket engine (and watching it explode)”)

    I once tested some standoffs for a spacecraft instrument, and we decided that while we were on the shake table and finished with the planned test, we would test to destruction just to see how well we had designed our standoffs, but it gave no necessary engineering information. When NASA heard that the standoffs had broken, they were upset, and we had to calm them down, because they hadn’t realized that we had deviated from the test plan.

    I have stuck to test plans ever since, and made sure to design the plans to test only what was necessary. This is a case where going above and beyond is not such a good idea.

    Boeing testing wings and airframes to destruction may have given them important engineering feedback and reassured customers that their purchases would last longer than the designed economic lifetime.

  • Diane Wilson

    Test-until-destruction and fatigue testing are done with aircraft because aircraft are reused. That hasn’t been done with rockets because rockets didn’t get reused, until SpaceX. And New Shepard, which takes months between re-use; Musk certainly plans faster turn-around than that.

    We’ll see. SpaceX seems intent to shake up the rocketry industry with more than just pricing.

Readers: the rules for commenting!


No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.


However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.


Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *