Stratolaunch considers multiple rockets for its giant airplane


Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar to the right or below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

The competition heats up: Stratolaunch is now considering widening its options for the upper stage that can be attached to its giant airplane.

[Chuck Beames, president of Seattle-based Vulcan Aerospace, the parent company of Stratolaunch Systems] said the interest in alternative launch options is driven by the growing interest in small satellites, for which the current Stratolaunch system is oversized. A smaller vehicle, he said, could be developed more quickly and less expensively. “It takes a more near-term focus on revenue generation,” he said.

Stratolaunch could eventually support several launch vehicles, he said, with varying payload capabilities to serve different customers. “We’ll likely have multiple launch vehicle options,” he said. “Some will be available earlier than others.”

It appears they are revising their launch system airplane into a modular design with a variety of upper stages, depending on customer. Note also the focus on the growing small satellite industry.

Share

One comment

  • pzatchok

    Stratolaunch was built to lift 500,000 pounds to 30,000 feet.

    That places its cargo capacity right in line with all other heavy lift vehicles. A market that by the time they get into will pretty much be all gobbled up by all the worldwide launch vehicles.

    They are now left with two choices.
    One.
    Lift smaller launch vehicles and hope they can pull a profit by lifting more than one at a time. Not a good option.
    If the first drop launch fails for some reason will they call off the second drop launch for safety reasons? And at that point is it safer to land with the rocket attached or just drop it and try to launch it and or watch it crash.

    Two.
    That monstrosity of a launch vehicle they were designing is big enough that if they reduced its payload it could be launched from the ground conventionally. Thus saving money on redesign and extra manufacturing costs for something different.
    But no need for the Stratolaunch vehicle.
    It also places it back into the lift area of other rockets already in production, tested and working. They better build it real cheap.

    Every time I even think of the Stratolaunch plane all I get are images of the Spruce Goose.
    It worked but did it ever really work?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *