The European Union’s program to reduce carbon emissions is in disarray.


Readers!
 
For many reasons, mostly political but partly ethical, I do not use Google, Facebook, Twitter. They practice corrupt business policies, while targeting conservative websites for censoring, facts repeatedly confirmed by news stories and by my sense that Facebook has taken action to prevent my readers from recommending Behind the Black to their friends.
 
Thus, I must have your direct support to keep this webpage alive. Not only does the money pay the bills, it gives me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.

 

Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.


 

Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

The European Union’s program to reduce carbon emissions is in disarray.

The article at the link is probably one of the worst written stories in the history of journalism. It is incoherent, disorganized, and confused. Moreover, the authors are so in favor of the regulations to limit fossil fuels that they are unable to even consider any reasons which might explain why Europe’s carbon credit market is collapsing and why the EU’s legislators rejected a rescue plan to save it.

In fact, because of their biases, the authors buried the real story, which is this:

Parliamentarians on April 16 voted 334 to 315 for blocking the carbon market rescue.

“This is the first time I can remember when parliament has put economic survival and jobs ahead of green orthodoxy,” said Roger Helmer, a member of the U.K. Independence Party who has been in the parliament for 14 years and opposes emissions trading. “It marks an absolute watershed.”

The bad economy and high debt in Europe is making the idea of raising taxes and adding more restrictions on fossil fuels very unappealing to politicians.

Share

2 comments

  • Pzatchok

    Its like driving a horse team.

    You never need to beat them just guide them.
    But the greenies having this idea that if they beat them when they slow down they will get more out of them.
    The economy is obviously slowing down. And has been for a while. Why beat the horse until its dead?
    Give the team a rest then drive them on to your goal again.
    Beat them to often or to much and they will refuse to work.

    They need to back off on a bunch of those regulations, taxes, fees and fines and just let the economy catch its breath and gain a little speed.
    Telling the economy that they are going to be hit with more regulations and costs just makes it slow down.

  • I support carbon emission reductions by industry, as long as a consumer, I have a choice to not pay for it. Let others buy the Priuses, windmills, and solar panels. I’ll stick with low cost hydrocarbons.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *