The FAA is inching closer to approving a license to allow SpaceX to conduct tests in Texas of its rocket-powered prototype of its Dragon capsule.

My annual birthday-month fund-raising drive for Behind the Black is now on-going. Not only do your donations help pay my bills, they give me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.


Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.


Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:

If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

The competition heats up: The FAA is inching closer to approving a license to allow SpaceX to conduct tests in Texas of its rocket-powered prototype of its Dragon capsule.

Simply, DragonFly is a propulsive system designed to allow the SpaceX Dragon capsule to perform propulsive landings (both with and without parachute assistance). Overall, DragonFly will use eight SuperDraco hypergolic engines capable of producing up to 16,400 lbf of thrust each. …

In all, SpaceX has proposed, and submitted to the FAA for commercial experimental license, a total of 30 DragonFly tests at its McGregor test facility. Four of the test flights involve DragonFly being dropped from a helicopter at an altitude of 10,000 ft with two propulsive assist landings parachutesand engines) and two propulsive landings (engines only). The remaining 26 of the proposed test flights will launch from a specially-built pad that will take between 1-2 weeks to construct (according to the FAA draft environmental report). These 26 flights will consist of eight parachute-assist landings and 18 full propulsive hops (rocket engines only).

We should all be relieved: The 76-page draft environmental impact statement noted that these tests will not destroy the Earth, and that their effect on global warming will be tiny. If the license is finally approved, testing should begin before the end of 2014.



  • Pzatchok

    I just don’t believe it. I can’t believe it.

    Its just not possible that a private company can do what the Russians have been doing for 40 years. Soft landing a ship from space on land.
    No way it can be done without a 10 billion dollar budget, 45 thousand engineers and 10 years of research.
    It just can’t be done. Its impossible.

    I will not believe it even if I see it. Even if it lands on me.

    The FAA must just be laughing behind their backs. Just letting them crash these things all over the place just to watch them fail.

    This must just be one of those Branson stunts just for publicity to get more launch contracts.
    They can’t be serious.

  • Can you provde links to information describing Russian’s soft-landing boost stages? I didn’t know they’d been doing that since the 70’s.

  • Pzatchok

    The Soyuz craft still used today to bring back cosmonauts uses braking thrusters in its final landing phase for a softer landing.
    Its been working since 1966 or so.

    Granted they are only fired a meter or so off the ground and they are purely solid rockets but the system has worked for decades.

    I see no reason the Dragon Fly cargo/passenger module can’t use a very similar system.

    The article was not about the boost stage but about the return capsule.
    Space X is pretty much already soft landing its first stage. At least on water for now.

  • geoffc

    All Soyuz’s capsules, land under parachutes on land, and just before touchdown, the seats of the cosmonauts rotate, and then solid rockets in the base of the heat shield fire, to reduce the velocity of impact, for a soft landing.

    Soft being relative there. Several Gs bump. Dragon is proposing a much softer landing.

  • Edward

    The landing is fascinating. It looks like the spacecraft explodes, but it is only the landing rockets. (1 minute)

    This ESA video has much more, including a view inside the capsule of the seats re-positioning (at 17:45), as geoffc mentioned: (20 minutes)
    “The soft landing is not really soft.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *