The geological history of Venus: What’s known, not known, and unknown.

Scroll down to read this post.
For many reasons, mostly political but partly ethical, I do not use Google, Facebook, Twitter. They practice corrupt business policies, while targeting conservative websites for censoring, facts repeatedly confirmed by news stories and by my sense that Facebook has taken action to prevent my readers from recommending Behind the Black to their friends.
Thus, I must have your direct support to keep this webpage alive. Not only does the money pay the bills, it gives me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.


Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.


Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:

If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

The geological history of Venus: What’s known, not known, and unknown.

This is a very clearly written overview by James Head, one of the world’s preeminent planetary geologists, of what has been learned about the geology of Earth’s sister planet, the planet of a million volcanoes. Key quote:

Many features on Venus (folded mountain belts, rift zones, tesserae) were like Earth, but there were few signs of Earth-like plate tectonics, so that Venus seemed to have a single lithospheric plate that was losing heat conductively and advectively. But the cratering record presented a conundrum. First, the average age of the surface was <20% of the total age of the planet, and second, the average was not a combination of very old and very young surfaces, such as Earth’s continents and ocean basins. Third, the lack of variability in crater density, and of a spectrum of crater degradation, meant that all geological units might be about the same age. This implied that the observed surface of Venus must have been produced in the past hundreds of millions of years, possibly catastrophically, with very little volcanic or tectonic resurfacing since then! Suddenly, Venus was not like Earth, nor like the Moon, Mars, or Mercury.

Some scientists even believe that Venus was essentially resurfaced in a massive volcanic event about a half billion years ago. Others disagree. Meanwhile, the European probe Venus Express has gotten hints that volcanic activity is still going on.

As Head concludes, it has been 20 years since the last spacecraft arrived at Venus to do geological research. It is time to return.



  • So not much as changed since Magellan. Which I guess isn’t surprising. Nova did a great special in the 90’s about Magellan’s work this makes it sound like its still mostly current.

    Sadly considering the track record for probes making it to the surface of Venus its unlikely anyone is going to front the money anytime soon for something to get crushed or get 20 minutes of data for a billion bucks.

  • Just to set the record straight, the last five Soviet Venus landers, Venera 10 through 14, all operated for more than hour on the surface, with the average generally closer to two hours. Venera 13 for example operated for more than 2 hours.The two probes before that all operated for more than 50 minutes, while Venera 7, the first to successfully send back data, operated for 23 minutes. See The Chronological Encyclopedia of Discoveries in Space, pages 92, 106, 136, 161, 162, 182, 183.

    Granted, the cost was high for so little operating time, but considering the hostile Venus surface environment these missions were hardly failures, they were engineering achievements of the first order.

  • wodun

    Why go to the surface? It might be more worthwhile to have some bots higher up in the atmosphere.

  • You learn a lot by working the atmosphere. In fact, it’s already been done by two French balloons that floated in the atmosphere for two days back in 1985. Nonetheless, to study the geology you have to go down to the ground and sample it, like the rovers on Mars are doing.

  • D. K. Williams

    ‘I would give Venus a very low priority for funding. It’s a very nasty place. A Martian probe may last for years, and we may send people there someday. Not so our sister planet, unfortunately.

  • Edward

    It may not be a place that we will go to, but as we explore the universe and look for other habitable planets, it is always good to know what kinds of planets there are, how they formed, and whether we could one day teraform them. It may be too early to prosper from all the answers that we can get from Venus, so the return on investment is lower than other explorations, but the answers are good to know, as they help us fill in pieces of the puzzle that is the universe.

    Some day we may figure out how to build a rover for Venus that will last a decade.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *