The media’s fraud and dishonest bias documented

For many reasons, mostly political but partly ethical, I do not use Google, Facebook, Twitter. They practice corrupt business policies, while targeting conservative websites for censoring, facts repeatedly confirmed by news stories and by my sense that Facebook has taken action to prevent my readers from recommending Behind the Black to their friends.
Thus, I must have your direct support to keep this webpage alive. Not only does the money pay the bills, it gives me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.


Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.


Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:

If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

Working for the Democratic Party: A detailed list of documented cases since 1992 where mainstream media sources were caught deliberately falsifying facts in order to slander conservatives or to promote the leftwing agenda.

None of these 48 examples are opinion pieces. In every case, false information or opinions were reported as facts, only to be found to be fabricated or completely counter to the facts as later documented. And as the author notes, the number of these faked stories has increased in recent years, partly because of the existence of alternative news sources on the web which point them out, but mostly because the mainstream media has become more blatantly partisan and dishonest in recent years.


One comment

  • joe

    NBC completely lost my respect with no.1, the side saddle fuel tank debacle, I owned a couple of those trucks through the years, literally millions of these trucks on the road and comparable death rates to any of the other pick up trucks, total farce of reporting just to gin up viewers or politically attack a large corporation. From that time all media was suspect, and when the media reported things that were not so, it would not pass the smell test, the days of trusting highly respected journalists(the tv kind) are over, at which point did news people become activists instead of reporters, trying to inject themselves into the story instead of reporting what actually is happening? Why is the population at large alright with this kind of reporting that values what someone else thinks instead of valuing the truth? When did it become alright that the big media conglomerates could pass off opinion as news?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *