Scroll down to read this post.

 

I am now in the final week of my July fund-raising campaign for Behind the Black, celebrating its 14th anniversary. Thank you all, from the people who have donated small amounts to those who have given large sums. I cannot truly express how much your support means to me.

 

The support of my readers through the years has given me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Four years ago, just before the 2020 election I wrote that Joe Biden's mental health was suspect. Only in the past two weeks has the mainstream media decided to recognize that basic fact.

 

Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Even today NASA and Congress refuses to recognize this reality.

 

In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.

 

Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:


5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.


The mystery of Tabby’s star deepens

Astronomers looking at the light variations of the star dubbed by some Tabby’s star have become even more baffled.

Spurred by a controversial claim that the star’s brightness gradually decreased by 14 percent from 1890 to 1989, Montet and Simon decided to investigate its behavior in a series of Kepler calibration images that had not previously been used for scientific measurements. “We thought that these data could confirm or refute the star’s long-term fading, and hopefully clarify what was causing the extraordinary dimming events observed in KIC 8462852,” explained Simon.

Simon and Montet found that, over the first three years of the Kepler mission, KIC 8462852 dimmed by almost 1 percent. Its brightness then dropped by an extraordinary 2 percent over just six months, remaining at about that level for the final six months of the mission. The pair then compared this with more than 500 similar stars observed by Kepler and found thata small fraction of them showed fading similar to that seen in KIC 8462852 over the first three years of Kepler images. However, none exhibited such a dramatic dimming in just six months, or a total change in brightness of 3 percent.

“The steady brightness change in KIC 8462852 is pretty astounding,” said Montet. “Our highly accurate measurements over four years demonstrate that the star really is getting fainter with time.  It is unprecedented for this type of star to slowly fade for years, and we don’t see anything else like it in the Kepler data.” 

At the moment, there is no good theory based on what astronomers know of stellar evolution to explain this star’s behavior. This does not mean the only explanation left is that aliens are building a Dyson sphere around the star, but it also leaves everyone at a loss to explain what is happening.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon. Or you can buy it directly from the author and get an autographed copy.

 
The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

14 comments

  • PeterF

    What about the explanation that the hydrogen fuel is running out and the star is about to nova?

  • Localfluff

    Well, either create a new stellar physics. Or finally understand that the telescope has a broken pixel! It weakens over time. It sometimes dips deeply briefly. What ground observations are there to confirm this anomaly? 20% change in brightness must be relatively easy to observe even from the ground. Does everything depend on one single telescope watching 1 out of 160,000 stars?Really? (Where I live, Tabby actually means “mistake”).

    @PeterF Plain mid-aged F-stars don’t suddenly go nova, and nothing goes nova like this anyway. There’s simply something wrong with the telescope.

  • Localfluff: The data hasn’t been collected from a single telescope. It comes from multiple observatories. This is not an instrment error.

  • Localfluff

    @Robert Zimmerman
    Did it really come from multiple telescopes?
    I haven’t seen any sources for that. It would be interesting to do, if you have the opportunity to offer one. I think it is a (tiny) telescope malfunction.

  • Andrew_W

    As far as I know a small nebular moving between us and Tabby’s star still hasn’t been ruled out.

  • Brendan

    There was an earlier paper (don’t have time to look now) that looked at photographic plates from the last century and found it fading. There was some discussion that this was due to the plates themselves having problems, but I remember the author is considered an expert in historical analysis of plates, and stood by his work.

    If Kepler has confirmed this, then there are two sources for the downward dimming trend, and this has been going on for a century.

    I’m not saying its aliens, but….

    http://images-cdn.9gag.com/photo/agNE8Br_700b.jpg

  • wayne

    Localfluff-
    The paper is here– (I haven’t read it, but it is available.)
    https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.01316

    Brendan:
    ..big fan of Cats in Space… especially low & zero-g acrobatics.

    Slow Motion Flipping Cats –Smarter Every Day
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtWbpyjJqrU

  • Localfluff

    wayne,
    Yes, there it is. And its conclusion says:
    “There is no known or proposed stellar phenomenon
    that can fully explain all aspects of the observed light
    curve.”

    The slow dimming observed on historic photo plates and now in Kepler data, could have reasonable astrophysical explanations. Like maybe some dust passing between us and it. But the sudden 20% dips that got attention to begin with have shapes (ingress and egress) which cannot be anything but a malfunctioning telescope. No transit of anything can explain it. Those images were all taken in the same orientation, i.e. the same few pixels on the CCD were at the job all of that time. When the telescope was differently oriented, no dips occurred.

  • hondo

    wayne – thanks loads for the cat link. Checking out Smarter Every Day for more material for my granddaughter. great find.

  • wayne

    Hondo–

    can’t take full-credit! But glad you enjoyed. Have a g-daughter myself, so I empathize.

    Yo– buy her the “Chronological Encyclopedia of Discovery’s in Space,” the author will sign it for you!

    http://behindtheblack.com/books/the-chronological-encyclopedia-of-discoveries-in-space/

  • Brendan

    Wane –
    I laughed at the response (I suppose I could say I LOL’d but I am trying to resist the degradation of our communications).

    My daughter loves that picture, and it somehow shows up on all our phones and iPads…. Don’t know how she keeps getting my password…

  • Brendan

    Localfluff….

    “have shapes (ingress and egress) which cannot be anything but a malfunctioning telescope.”

    Or…. AWIENS!!!

  • Localfluff

    Not even “awians” look like that when they transit a star with something.
    The slow 100 year dimming could for example be a distant background star that from our point of view slowly moves in behind Tabby’s star. That’s something which might happen one out of the 160,000 stars Kepler1 stared at. Most explanations have the problem of something happening only one star. Not that historic photo plates have been as thoroughly examined for that many other stars (it is a tricky job since the chemicals have degraded over time and different chemicals were used as photography evolved and they have different sensitivity to different colors i.e. to different stars). It is a middle aged F star about 50% larger and heavier than the Sun and overall rather Sun like. It is not an exotic star, so any new heliophysics is not to be expected.

    The brief deep dimmings only occurred when the telescope was rotated in the same way (it turned 90 degrees four times per Solar orbit to keep heat shield and solar panels toward the Sun) and therefor a telescope problem is a likely explanation for it, and the only reasonable one proposed.

  • PeterF

    Aliens COULD be the explanation! They might be sending a smallest toward our star powered by a laser! Like in “The Mote in God’s Eye”
    https://www.amazon.ca/Mote-Gods-Eye-Book-ebook/dp/B004YDL2CY/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1475781737&sr=1-1&keywords=the+mote+in+god%27s+eye
    Budget cuts and aging equipment over the years could explain the diminishing power…kind of whats happening to the DSN?

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *