Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

 
Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.

 

“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.

 

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.


The scramble in Congress to head the House committee on Space, Science, and Technology after November’s election has begun.

The scramble in Congress to head the House committee on space after November’s election has begun.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) and Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) have begun to quietly campaign to replace Rep. Ralph Hall as chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology next year, according to Stu Witt, General Manager and CEO of the Mojave Air and Space Port.

If Rohrabacher gets the chairmanship it will be very be good news for commercial space, and bad news for the NASA-built and very expensive Space Launch System (SLS). He has been a strong supporter of private space, and will likely want to funnel money to it from SLS.

I’m not sure giving private space more cash is necessarily a good thing, as that will encourage these new companies to be less efficient, more expensive, and more dependent on the government. However, getting SLS shut down will certainly help the federal budget deficit.

Readers!
 

I must unfortunately ask you for your financial support because I do not depend on ads and rely entirely on the generosity of readers to keep Behind the Black running. You can either make a one time donation for whatever amount you wish, or you sign up for a monthly subscription ranging from $2 to $15 through Paypal or $3 to $50 through Patreon.


Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.


Your support is even more essential to me because I not only keep this site free from advertisements, I do not use the corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook to promote my work. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.


You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:
 


 

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
 

Or you can donate by using Zelle through your bank. You will need to give my name and email address (found at the bottom of the "About" page). The best part of this electronic option is that no fees will be deducted! What you donate will be what I receive.

7 comments

  • Joe

    The federal budget deficit in 2011 (the last year for which complete data is available) was $1.3 Trillion. The average yearly cost of the “very expensive” SLS is $3 Billion. That is about two tenths of one percent of the Federal Budget Deficit.

    Where is the other 99.8% of the money (another 499 such cuts) going to come from?

    I know you are against the SLS, but trying to use deficit reduction as an argument to cancel it is a real stretch.

  • wodun

    There isn’t any one big thing to cut. The three big things are SS, Medicare/Medicaid, and Defense. That’s 80% of our budget but none of those will be cut out of existence. If we want to lower deficit spending it will take lots of little cuts of worthwhile programs, including the big 3. There are always more worthy causes than money.

    When it comes to SLS people might like to see that program gone but (I hope) people want NASAs funding not to get cut. So cutting SLS wouldn’t necessarily lead to a reduced deficit but maybe less waste.

  • Joe

    Saying that eliminating SLS would be “less waste” is a value judgment argument that has been beaten into the ground. I hope we can agree not to beat it one more time.

    As to the rest of your post, I actually agree with it.

  • steve mac

    I’ve been a supporter of Rohrabacher for years and I don’t live in his state. He has been a consistent voice for space exploration.

  • Joe

    Rohrabacher is an interesting political character.

    He supported the Delta Clipper Project vociferously, but then it was being developed in his district.

    On the other hand, he just as vociferously opposed the Transhab Module (the basic concept of which was eventually picked up by Bigelow Aerospace).

    If you want to support him (even though he does not live in your district), keep in mind the old cliché. Be careful what you wish for, you might get it.

  • DougSpace

    A NASA study showed that the Falcon 9 was developed between 1/3 and 1/8h the cost had it been done with FAR regulations. So yes, the SLS should be cancelled. Two commercially viable Falcon Heavies docked on LEO makes the SLS redundant. But the freed money should go to a “Lunar COTS” program to extend commercial space through cis-lunar to include the ice of the lunar poles.

  • Joe

    It is interesting how any topic is always turned to singing the praises of Space X.

    It is not readily apparent what that has to do with the use of deficit reduction as an argument to cancel the SLS, since you seem to be saying that any money allegedly saved should be spent elsewhere not used to reduce the deficit.

    As far as the NASA study is concerned, if you really believe that simply changing a management style can reduce cost by a factor of three (much less eight) why not advocate the application of the same management structure to the SLS program? It should give the same kind of alleged saving there as well.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *