Thumbprints on Mars!

Week Three: Ninth Anniversary Fund-Raising Drive for Behind the Black

It is now the third week in my annual anniversary fund-raising campaign for Behind the Black.

Please consider donating. I am trying to avoid advertising on this website, but will be forced to add it if I do not get enough support from my readers. You can give a one-time contribution, from $5 to $100, or a regular subscription for as little as $2 per month. Your support will be deeply appreciated, and will allow me to continue to report on science and culture freely.

Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

Thumbprints terrain on Mars!
Click for full image.

Honestly, don’t ask me. I didn’t come up with the name. I found the image on the right, cropped and reduced to post here, as part of the April image dump from the high resolution camera of Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. The uncaptioned release dubbed this “Thumbprint Terrain in Northern Mid-Latitudes,” and it is obvious to see why. The cropped image on the right focuses in on the oval white mounds that really do look like some giant child was touching a soft damp muddy surface randomly with his fingers, leaving behind raised fingerprints as the mud stuck to his fingers as he pulled them away.

Each white area seems to have a crater. I suspect these are not impact craters, but possibly mud volcanoes, as each is at the top of a mound. My hypothesis is further strengthened by the location, which is deep within the low northern plains of Mars, a place where some scientists believe an intermittent ocean once existed. These mounds could have easily formed at that ocean’s floor, or thereafter when the land here was drying out.

On the other hand, these could be from impact. Maybe they are scattered ejecta from a larger impact, landing here in a group on a wet muddy surface. The impacts might have concentrated the material around the crater, making it more resistant to erosion, which is why the craters now stand above the floor of the plain.

On the third hand, all these theories could be wrong. Have any of your own?



  • mpthompson

    Hmmm, what do impact craters look like that are formed under a few hundred meters of water? Do they form indistinct impressions such as these?

  • Lee S.

    I doubt it very much…. On mud flats they might… But unless the meteorite is truly massive it wouldn’t…
    The reason almost all impact craters are round, no matter the angle of the impact is because the damage is not caused by the meteorite throwing out ejecta, but by the acctual energy released by the impact… Think a nuclear bomb… If dropped from above or launched in at a low angle on a missile the blast range will still be circular.

    An impact into water of any significant depth would release it’s kinetic energy upon contact with the water, and whilst it might cause a sunami on the surface it could not create such perfectly formed craters.

    I’m thinking mud flats or, like on, mud volcanoes ….

  • Lee s

    ” Like Bob, mud volcanoes” even! ;-)

  • Edward_2

    Mars is a much more interesting place than the Moon.

    There should be 100+ rovers rolling over Mars – exploring every inch of Mars.

    How about robots BUILDING and REPAIRING rovers/robots ON Mars?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *