Time/PBS video documentary nominated for Emmy despite factual error in title

My annual birthday-month fund-raising drive for Behind the Black is now on-going. Not only do your donations help pay my bills, they give me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.


Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.


Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:

If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

Fake news: The Time/PBS video documentary A Year in Space has been nominated for an Emmy award, despite a blatant factual error in the show’s title.

I haven’t seen the documentary, and so it might a great achievement. Nonetheless, this mission only lasted 340 days, not a year, and to call it “a year in space” is not only false, but an outright lie. For a news organization to start out this wrong, in the title, and then for it to get an Emmy nomination, tells us a great deal about the standards of accuracy in television news.



  • BSJ

    I’ve been wondering why it was heralded as a year in space since Kelly landed.

    That’s what everybody called it back then. Never made any sense to me…

  • mike shupp

    I sort of agree, but “Almost A Year In Space” isn’t an especially great title. Also, my recollection is that NASA itself basically pushed the “Year in Space” label whenever it referred to one or other of the Kelly brothers, so the Times/PBS people are just following along, making it clear that their tale is the same one NASA speaks about.

    So yeah, but … it’s a pretty crummy title.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *