Scroll down to read this post.


Please consider supporting my work here at Behind The Black by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, in any one of the following ways:


1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.


2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:

5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

Two dozen exoplanets superior to Earth for life?

The uncertainty of science: A team of scientists have now identified 24 exoplanets from the Kepler telescope archive that they propse might actually be better for life than Earth itself.

All the exoplanets are rocky and terrestrial, like the Earth. All are in the habitable zone, meaning that they orbit their star at a distance that makes their general temperature comparable to Earth.

What makes them superior, according to these scientists, are three factors. First, their stars are not G-type stars, like the Sun, but K-types. K-types have much longer lifespans, 70 billion years compared to the Sun’s 8 to 10 billion, allowing more time for life to develop.

Second, the planets have a slightly greater mass than Earth.

Part of the reason the Earth is habitable is because it’s large enough to be geologically active, giving it a protective magnetic field, and has enough gravity to retain an atmosphere. According to the team, if a planet was 10 percent larger, it would have more surface area to live on. If it was 1.5 times as massive as the Earth, its interior would retain more heat from radioactive decay, would remain active longer, and hold onto its atmosphere for a longer time.

Finally, the orbits of these two dozen exoplanets makes them just slighter warmer than Earth, which is thought to be beneficial to life.

This is interesting, but it is pure guesswork. These factors might make our Earth life happier, but these scientists have no idea if such conditions are beneficial or harmful to the creation of life. At present we have zero data on what the ideal conditions would be.

Conscious Choice cover

Now available in hardback and paperback as well as ebook!


From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.


“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.


All editions available at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all book vendors. The ebook can be purchased direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit, in which case you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner. Note that the price for the ebook, $3.99, goes up to $5.99 on September 1, 2022.


Autographed printed copies are also available at discount directly from me (hardback $24.95; paperback $14.95). Just email me at zimmerman @ nasw dot org.


  • pzatchok

    I like how they said that since the star type was longer lived there would be more time for life to develop.
    Like billions of years more than on Earth.
    They act like they will either quarantine that planet just because in a billion years life might eventually development. Or someone will be around who actually cares.

    And if life would be happier on a warmer planet why are we so afraid of global warming?

  • Cotour

    If these are “Better” places than planet earth maybe we can get all of the Liberals, Leftists, ANTIFA, BLM and TDS laden and unhappy Democrat party members together and send them to one of them so they can build the “utopia” that they are determined to build here on top of our beautiful country.

    I think its time that these kinds of people are encouraged to move, all expenses paid, to another planet and demonstrate just how unlucky and ignorant we all are here in America that resist their efforts. Lets get Musk on this, he could make it happen.

  • LocalFluff

    Life appeared on Earth as soon as its molten surface cooled down. So time is not an issue from the one sample that we know of and ourselves are. Do they mean that those planets have been around for 5 times the age of the universe?

    Venus is practically as large as the Earth is, but has no magnetic field. And holds on to a 90 times denser atmosphere. It is in the habitable zone, but has 900 Fahrenheit surface temperature.

    These guys certainly don’t know nothing about what they are talking about!

  • Tom Billings

    Local asked:

    “Do they mean that those planets have been around for 5 times the age of the universe?”

    No, but they have the potential to last far longer than our Sun does, if the current solar models are correct. So, they might yet evolve life, even if they have not, by chance, just yet. Since they are just a bit heavier than Earth their mantle circulation *may* be moving fast enough that their CO2 variations are not as extreme as Earth’s, giving a more stable temperature.

    “It (Venus) is in the habitable zone, but has 900 Fahrenheit surface temperature.”

    That is because it has a 90 bar CO2 atmosphere. Basically, all its carbonate rocks were calcined into Oxides and CO2 several hundred million years ago, by a vast turnover of its crust, instead of the steady and slow turnover we have on Earth. This is because Venus is just a bit too small to have the currents of molten rock in its mantle pushing at the crust hard enough for continual turnover, but just big enough for stresses from the currents in the mantle to build up, and then turn over the entire crust in a single burst of activity releasing the heat of mantle material onto the surface.

    If the Earth lost all its carbonate rocks to calcination, we’d likely have around 90 Bars of CO2 in the atmosphere as well, and similar surface conditions to Venus, though maybe slightly cooler because of greater distance from the Sun.

  • John

    I don’t think Venus is too small for plate tectonics- It’s practically the same size as earth. Quick web search: 0.9499 the size of Earth and 0.815 as massive. Pure speculation but I think whatever went wrong on Venus might be related to the event that caused its rotation be so off compared to the other terrestrial planets and the supposed global resurfacing event. I think Venus got whacked and didn’t get a large moon out of it.

    Yeah, there’s a lot of assumptions and guesswork in that article. But…the old world left for the new world for freedom and opportunity. I wonder if the first people to leave Earth will just be fed up with oppression and authoritarianism. When there’s no where else to go, maybe I can deal with a deeper gravity well and a nice balmy climate, and G type stars are over rated. Forget Mars, no air, no magnetosphere, no rivers, no tree analogs, no nothing. How far away are these planets again, maybe we can hot rod starship?!

  • Col Beausabre

    Ahhhh, Exo-Biology, a field of “study” with no examples, just theories

  • mpthompson

    If I recall correctly, the latest broadly accepted theories on why Venus has such a slow rotation has to do with its very thick atmosphere in combination with tidal interactions from the Sun slowed the planet’s rotation down due to friction over 100’s of millions of years. Also, because it likely lacked the whack the Earth got that created the moon which ejected a lot of crustal mass into space, Venus has a thicker crust which accounts for the difference in crustal dynamics between the two planets.

    Unfortunately, we don’t know if it is Earth or Venus which is the atypical oddball with regards to rocky terrestrial planets. My bet is it would be the Earth.

    One thing that is nice about the Earth’s relatively low mass with regards to the rocky terrestrial planets we are finding is that is still possible to use chemical energy to get to orbit. If the Earth were much more massive launching even the smallest artificial satellite would be orders of magnitude more difficult using current day rocket technologies. Whether over the long term this would be a hinderance to civilizations becoming space faring is unknown, but it would certainly have a profound effect on recent human history as it transitions from the industrial age to the information age.

  • LocalFluff

    This is not favored (but also not completely excluded) among astronomers, but it could be that Venus is different because of a collision. Either by a huge comet that hit it, bringing all the CO2 and stopping its rotation. But that’s unlikely for ballistic reasons. Or perhaps a bit more likely that Venus was formed with a large moon that spiraled into it, like Phobos will crash into Mars within a few 10 millions of years (only 1% of Mars’ age from now). On Venus all the carbon remained an atmospheric gas, while on Earth that somehow so to speak “crystalized” into biology and minerals.

    But WHY does Venus have a thick crust and a thick atmosphere and no magnetic dynamo, when we do?

Readers: the rules for commenting!


No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.


However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.


Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.