Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.


“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.


Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.

University of South Carolina administrators refuse to teach the Constitution as required by state stature because they find it “inconvenient.”

The law is such an inconvenient thing: University of South Carolina administrators refuse to teach the Constitution, as required by state stature, because they find it “inconvenient.”

State statutes maintain that all students at a South Carolina public school must spend a certain amount of time studying the Constitution and the Federalist Papers. Failure to abide by the statute is grounds for the removal of the head of the public institution–in this case, President Pastides. “Willful neglect or failure on the part of any public school superintendent, principal or teacher or the president, teacher or other officer of any high school, normal school, university or college to observe and carry out the requirements [of the statute] shall be sufficient cause for the dismissal or removal of such person from his position,” according to South Carolina law.

The USC administrators say the statute is inconvenient to enforce, however, since it would disrupt the university’s current course requirements.

It might inconvenient, and the law itself might be foolish, but it isn’t up the administrators to decide this. They should be fired.


In order to remain completely independent and honest in my writing, I accept no sponsorships from big space companies or any political organizations. Nor do I depend on ads.

Instead, I rely entirely on the generosity of readers to keep Behind the Black running. You can either make a one time donation for whatever amount you wish, or you sign up for a monthly subscription ranging from $2 to $15 through Paypal, or $3 to $50 through Patreon, or any amount through Zelle.

The best method to donate or subscribe is by using Zelle through your internet bank account, since it charges no fees to you or I. You will need to give my name and email address (found at the bottom of the "About" page). What you donate is what I get.

To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.

For PayPal click one of the following buttons:


Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If these electronic payment methods don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


  • Cotour

    Total control will be accomplished when the people come to believe what their government tells them because they have no proper reference point related to their naturally born rights to “life liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. Teaching the concepts contained within the Constitution is not in keeping with the new paradigm that our government has determined is necessary to create. Its part of the slow boil principle.

    Be outraged America.

  • PeterF

    What? Do these administrators think that they posses a pen and a telephone?

  • Patrick Ritchie


    In the post above you state:

    It might inconvenient, and the law itself might be foolish, but it isn’t up the administrators to decide this. They should be fired.

    While in a February 13th post about Connecticut gun owners failing to register their weapons you wrote:

    When the law has contempt for freedom, then the only answer is contempt for the law.


    I would appreciate it if you could elaborate on how, in your mind, these two situations are different.

    More specifically: when (if ever) do you think it is OK for citizens to disregard or break the law?

  • Patrick,

    I really like how you catch this stuff. The question is spectacularly good. Unfortunately, I am about to leave for two weeks on a trip to Israel. This question deserves a long answer. If I get inspired on the plane I might write it up for you.

    What I can say immediately is that both circumstances demonstrate how badly written laws promote contempt for the law. Sometimes that contempt might be justified, but the contempt itself is a bad thing, generated by the misuse of the legislative power.

    More to come.

  • D.K.Williams

    As a USC grad, (the real USC, not the faux one in LA), I would have no issue with the firing of Pastides. This law is vague and easy to comply with. Just set up a booth in the Russell Center (student union) and hand out brochures on the Constitution, Federalist papers, whatever. Have a speaker give a colloquim on this, or a related topic, which will be attended by a few graduate students abpnd one or two people who wandered in by mistake. It’s what the other state colleges do, and it seems to satisfy the requirement.

  • Pzatchok

    There is no proof any of the fire arm owners are breaking the law.

    They could have privately sold the weapons.
    Or they could have reconfigured them to comply with the new laws definition of an illegal weapon.

    The instructors are just outright ignoring the law and doing it out in the open with little to no excuse.

    More than likely because no one has ever been prosecuted for something like this ans feel free to do as they please until someone goes to jail over it.

    Send one to jail and the rest will either teach the material or try to change the law.

  • Patrick Ritchie

    Thanks Bob, looking forward to hearing more of your thoughts on this.

Readers: the rules for commenting!


No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.


However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.


Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.