Video of SpaceX fairing drop test

For many reasons, mostly political but partly ethical, I do not use Google, Facebook, Twitter. They practice corrupt business policies, while targeting conservative websites for censoring, facts repeatedly confirmed by news stories and by my sense that Facebook has taken action to prevent my readers from recommending Behind the Black to their friends.
Thus, I must have your direct support to keep this webpage alive. Not only does the money pay the bills, it gives me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.


Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.


Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:

If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

Capitalism in space: SpaceX today released footage of a drop test of a fairing and the near miss catch by their ship Mr. Steven.

I have embedded the footage below the fold. After they drop the fairing from a helicopter, the ship comes within mere feet of catching the fairing in its giant net. Quite spectacular.



  • Col Beausabre

    Bob – “ship comes within mere feet of catching the fairing in its giant net”

    Doesn’t matter if it misses by feet or the width of the Pacific Ocean, it’s still a failure. You either catch it or you don’t – and they don’t. You wouldn’t call an airliner “almost” making the runway, “successful” (and I know, “Any landing you can walk away from is successful”). Matter of fact, there would be an FAA investigation and lawsuits.

    To my mind, the parasail needs active control. Maybe it homes in on a radio beacon in the center of the net. It can’t hurt that both vehicles are trying to reach the same spot at the same time

  • Col Beausabre: Your comparison to an airliner is inappropriate. That is operational. This was an engineering drop test, where failure is often expected but useful in figuring out how to eventually make this system operational.

    I personally have doubts about this system for recovering the fairing, but I am certainly not an expert. I admire the daring engineering, which seems to be getting them closer and closer to success.

  • ted high

    Back in the fiftys and the sixtys when spy sats had cameras that ejected they caught the camera in the air. They had a special plane with poles on the front that acted like a funnel and when they caught the parachute they winched the camera onboard. With the speed of the faring, in the film, they could snare the chute by hovering and lowering a hook and then either lower it to the ground or hook it to a winch and pull it aboard or keep it close for landing.

  • Judy

    “Missed it by that much!”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *