White House tries rebranding global warming

Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar to the right or below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

Rather than address the many questions people have about climate research (questionable research, unclear data, corrupt scientists), the White House has come up with a much better approach: Change the name of “global warming” to “global climate disruption.” Now, doesn’t that explain everything?


One comment

  • Chris L.

    I started questioning the whole AGW idea when global warming advocates started calling it “climate change”. It smelled a bit too much like PR (as in propaganda) and made any change in climate (what we used to call weather) “proof” they are right. At that point, AGW became an unfalsifiable hypothesis.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *