Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

 
Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.

 

“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.

 

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.


Why are so many offended by Tim Tebow’s faith?

Why are so many offended by Tim Tebow’s faith?

The author says it’s because people are insecure and feel threatened. I have a simpler explanation: hatred of and bigotry against someone who is religious.

Readers!
 

Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.


Your support is even more essential to me because I keep this site free from advertisements and do not participate in corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.


You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:
 


 

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

3 comments

  • Kelly Starks

    > Why are so many offended by Tim Tebow’s faith?

    It is rather irritating and in your face. And hes riding it.

  • Jim

    Old Seinfeld episode where a priest asks Jerry if the joke offended him as a Jew, and Jerry responds, “no, it offends me as a comedian.”
    Tebow does not offend me as a Christian, he offends me as a football player. He is a marginal QB at best (see the last game).
    In that game he was not even marginal…he stunk. Good luck with the Steelers next week.

  • Tom Billings

    Bob, I not interested in Tebow’s football. I was forced into football and into team sports in general, and dropped it as soon as I could without getting beaten into the ground.

    I am not surprised at all that Tebow is dissed for his faith. If you don’t do that, you often are not counted as “one of the smart kids”, as defined by the academic community’s dominant culture. Here in Portland, it is not uncommon to go to a First Saturday Party, and hear remarks viciously bigoted against people openly admitting they are christian. If the same were said of almost any minority not associated with christian faith, the same people would denounce the statement as “racist”, “fascist”, or some other epithet.

    Basically, in the colleges, people are not given permission to openly criticize a wide range of groups that do not contribute a net benefit to industrial society. With Christianity, however, they are very openly given permission. They carry these perceptions of permission into adult life.

    Christianity was targeted inside academia as the goat, when it became clear in the late 18th century that the tenure system would mean there would never be enough tenured positions. Theology had been dominant since the universities restarted in the Middle Ages. Science was used, mostly by humanities professors and groups, as a very convenient club against not only the pretensions of some theologians to pass judgement on non-religious aspects of life, but against the legitimacy of theology at all. In the last 200 years that has meant that it has become increasingly useful to create hostility, inside academia, to the preponderant religion in our society, which is Christianity. In the last 50 years this has blossomed outside academia as a larger percentage of the population is exposed to the bigotries that develop inside the academy.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *